Microbiological profile of diabetic foot ulcers and its antibiotic susceptibility pattern in a teaching hospital, Gujarat


  • Vaidehi J. Mehta Department of Microbiology, C. U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar -363001, Gujarat, India
  • Kunjan M. Kikani Department of Microbiology, C. U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar -363001, Gujarat, India
  • Sanjay J. Mehta Department of Microbiology, C. U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar -363001, Gujarat, India


Diabetic foot ulcer, Polymicrobial infection, Bacterial isolates, Antibiotic susceptibility pattern


Background: Diabetic foot lesions are a major medical, social and economic problem and are the leading cause of hospitalization for patients with diabetes worldwide. Infection sometimes leads to amputation of the infected foot if not treated promptly. The present study was conducted to isolate and identify the bacterial pathogens associated with diabetic foot ulcer and to find out its antibiotic susceptibility pattern to reduce the risk of complications.

Methods: Total 100 pus samples were collected from patients having diabetic foot ulcer, during July to October 2012. Samples were processed as per standard guidelines.

Results: Out of 100 pus samples, 73 (73%) yielded growth of organisms making total of 92 isolates. Out of 92 bacterial isolates, 72 were gram negative and 20 were gram positive. Pseudomonas aeruginosa 25 (27%) was most common isolate causing diabetic foot infections followed by 20 (22%) Klebsiella sp., 17 (19%) E. coli, 15 (17%) S. aureus, 6 (7%) Proteus sp. and 4(3%) Enterococci, 2 (2%) Acinetobacter sp. and 2(2%) CONS and 1(1%) Providencia. Out of 72 GNB, 50 (69.4%) were extended spectrum β lactamase (ESBL) producer. Most gram negative isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, gentamicin, ampicillin-sulbactam and gatifloxacin. All GNB were sensitive to imipenem. Out of 15 S. aureus, 9 (60%) were Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid.

Conclusions: Pseudomonas sp. was the most common cause of infections.  Most isolates were multi drug resistance.


Vimalin Hena J, Growther L. Studies on Bacterial Infections of Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Afr J Cln Exper Microbiol. 2010;11(3):146-9.

Lipsky BA, Pecoraro RE, Larson SA, Hanley ME, Ahroni JH. Outpatient Management of uncomplicted lower –extremity infection in diabetic patients. Arch Indian Med. 1990;150:790-7.

Abdulrazak A, Bitar ZI, Al-Shamali AA, Mobasher LA. Bacteriological study of diabetic foot infections. J Diabetes Complications. 2005;19(3):138-41.

Asha Konipparambil Pappu, Aprna Sinha, Aravind Johnson: Microbiological profile of Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Calicut Medical Journal. 2011;9(3):e2.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 22 informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, USA. 2012;32(3):M100-S22.

Ozer B, Kalaci A, Semerci E, Duran N, Davul S, Yanat A N: Infections and aerobic bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot, African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2010;4(20):2153-60.

J Vimalian Hena, Lali Growther. Studies on bacterial infections of Diabetic foot Ulcer, Afr J Cln Exper. Microbiol. 2010;11(3):146-9.

Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Nesbit CA. Diabetic foot infections: bacteriology and activity of oral antimicrobial agents against bacteria isolated from consecutive cases. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:638–41.

Tentolouris N, Jude EB, Smirnof I, Knowles EA, Boulton AJ. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an increasing problem in a diabetic foot clinic. Diabet Med. 1999;16:767–71.

Shanker EM, Mohan V, Premlatha G, Srinivasan RS, Usha AR: Bacterial etiology of diabetic foot infections in South India. Eur J Intern Med. 2005;16:567–70.

Hartemann-Heurtier A, Robert J, Jacqueminet S, Ha Van G, Golmard JL, Jarlier V, Grimaldi A. Diabetic foot ulcer and multidrug-resistant organisms: risk factors and impact. Diabet Med. 2004;21:710 –15.

Wagner FW. The avascular foot: a system of diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle. 1981;2:64 –122.

M, Caillaux M, Yazdanpanah Y, Mouton Y. Culture of percutaneous bone biopsy specimens for diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: concordance with ulcer swab cultures. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:57– 62.

Erle G, de Lalla F. Deep tissue biopsy vs. superficial swab culture monitoring in the microbiological assessment of limb threatening diabetic foot infection. Diabet Med. 2001;18:822–7.

Mantey I, Hill RL, Foster AV, Wilson S, Wade JJ, Edmonds ME. Infection of foot ulcers with Staphylococcus aureus associated with increased mortality in diabetic patients. Commun Dis Public Health. 2000 Dec;3(4):288-90.

Fejfarova V, Jerkovska A, Skiboia J, Petkov V. Pathogen resistance and other risk factors in the frequency of lower limb amputation in patients with the diabetic foot syndrome. Vnitr Lek. 2002;48:302–6.

Dang CN, Prasad YD, Boulton AJ, Jude EB. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the diabetic foot clinic: a worsening problem. Diabet Med. 2003;20:159 –61.

Viswanathan V, Jasmine JJ, Snehalatha C, Ramachandran A: Prevalence of pathogen in diabetic foot infection in South Indian type 2 diabetic patients. J Assoc Physicians India. 2002;50:1013–16.

Lipsky BA, Berendt AR. Principles and practice of antibiotic therapy of diabetic foot infections. Diabetes Metab Res. 2000;16(1):42-6.

Mohanty S, Kapil A, Dhawan B, Das BK. Bacteriological and antimicrobial Susceptibility profile of soft tissue infections from Northern India. Indian J Med Sci. 2004;58;10-5.

Ikem RT, Kolawole BA, Ikem IC. The prevalence, presentation and outcome of diabetic foot lesions in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Trop Doct. 2002;32:226-7.




How to Cite

Mehta, V. J., Kikani, K. M., & Mehta, S. J. (2017). Microbiological profile of diabetic foot ulcers and its antibiotic susceptibility pattern in a teaching hospital, Gujarat. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 3(1), 92–95. Retrieved from https://www.ijbcp.com/index.php/ijbcp/article/view/953



Original Research Articles