Knowledge, attitude and practice of pharmacovigilance among private healthcare professionals of Rajkot city

Bharti N. Karelia, Kiran G. Piparava

Abstract


Background: Spontaneous reporting is an important tool in pharmacovigilance. However, its success depends on cooperative and motivated prescribers. In order to improve the reporting rate, it is essential to improve the Knowledge, Attitude and the Practices (KAP) of the healthcare professionals with regards to the ADR reporting and the pharmacovigilance. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of pharmacovigilance among private prescribers of Rajkot city.

Methods: It was a prospective questionnaire based survey type of study which was carried out among the private practitioners of Rajkot city. A questionnaire which was suitable for assessing the basic Knowledge, Attitude and the Practice (KAP) of pharmacovigilance was designed and distributed among the private doctors and filled up forms collected back and analyzed by microsoft excel 2007.

Results: Out of 600 distributed forms 332 forms were received back, reflecting a response rate of 55.33%. 13.86% doctors didn’t know about the term pharmacovigilance. 76.80% doctors experienced ADR during their clinical practices. 17.77% doctors maintain the record for patient safety and medico legal aspect.13.25% doctors reported ADR at different places. Lack of knowledge and awareness and medico legal problems were common reasons for under reporting of ADR.78.30% doctors agreed to keep ADR monitoring mandatory. Preferred methods for reporting ADR were electronic media and personal communication.

Conclusions: There was a great need to create awareness among the private doctors to improve the reporting of ADRs. Even though ADR reporting make compulsory by doctors unless there is no strict government rules and regulation success of pharmacovigilance programme is questionable.


Keywords


Adverse drug reaction, Knowledge, attitude, and practices study, Pharmacovigilance, Spontaneous reporting

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gupta SK. Pharmacovigilance: current status & future challenges. Indian Journal of Medical Specialities 2013;4(1):1-4.

Pharmacovigilance programme of India for assuring drug safety. Available at http://www.cdsco.nic.in/pharmaovigilance_intro.htm#goal&objectives. Accessed 1 October 2013.

NCC pharmacovigilance programme of India. Available at http://ipc.nic.in. Accessed 1 October 2013.

Gupta A, Uppal A. Adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance. Knowledge attitude and practice among the resident doctors. J Pharma Sci 2011;3:1064-9.

Hardeep, Bajaj JK, and Rakesh K. A Survey on the Knowledge, Attitude and the Practice of Pharmacovigilance among the Health Care Professionals in a Teaching Hospital in Northern India. J Clin Diagno Res 2011 January; 7(1):97-99.

Pimpalkhute SA, Jaiswal KM, Suntakke SD, Bajait CS, Gaikwad A. Evaluation of a awareness about pharmacovigilance and adverse dryg reaction monitoring in resident doctors of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Indian J Med Sci 2012; 66:55-61.

Desai CK, Iyer G, Panchal J, Shah S, Dikshit RK. An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among prescribers at a tertiary care hospital. Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):129-36.

Mishra H, Kumar V. Pharmacovigilance: Current Scenario in a Tertiary Care Teaching Medical College in North India. J Pharmacovigilance 2013;1:108. doi:10.4172/2329-6887.1000108.