Knowledge, attitudes and practices of medical researchers toward authorship in scientific journals

Balaji D. More; Anju B. More; Harsh J. Suthar

doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20201181

Authors

Balaji D. More Department of Pharmacology, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Anju B. More Department of Anatomy, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Harsh J. Suthar Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20201181

Keywords:

Articles, Authorship, Medical, Publication, Research

Abstract

Background: The knowledge, attitudes and practices of scientific authorship vary across different regions. We conducted this study to understand this variation among medical researchers in India.

Methods: An anonymous web-based researcher-survey invited all faculty, researchers and PhD students at Pacific institute of Medical sciences, Udaipur, India. The study design and the questionnaire were approved by the institutional ethics committee. Basic information on study was given to obtain consent for participation. The 30 questions on authorship experience and related issues were based on the statements in International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and other national and international recommendations on authorship. Participants reported their authorship experiences and answered multiple choice questionnaires.

Results: The response rate was 36.36% among the participants, who were post-graduate with up to 10 years of research experience. About 62.5% had not been appropriately acknowledged as authors at some point during their career. Contributors (authorship) and ethical peer review is perceived as the key principle of research integrity. Though, single authorship was regarded as more significant, interdisciplinary management of diseases increases number of co-authors. A platform to challenge authorship, declaration of contribution in authorship and shared responsibility of co-authors in case of fraudulent publication was majority opinion.

Conclusions: Almost 50 of the participant medical researchers had knowledge of formal authorship requirements. Majority agreed with the criteria would help in decreasing the authorship dispute in the medical research. There is need for awareness and continuous education on these criteria.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Wager E. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas. 2009;62(2):109-12.

Rosenberg J, Bauchner H, Backus J, De Leeuw P, Drazen J, Frizelle F, et al. The New ICMJE Recommendations. Nat Med J India. 2013;26(5):258-9.

Marušić A, Bošnjak L, Jerončić A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PloS one. 2011;6(9):e23477.

Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA. 1994;271(6):469-71.

Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G, Sarvas M, Aakvaag A. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. Lancet. 1999;354(9172):57-61.

Hofmann B, Myhr AI, Holm S. Scientific dishonesty-a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(1):3.

Smilowitz NR, Ferguson JJ, Weisz G. Controversies surrounding authorship of manuscripts by industry employees: academic and industry perspectives. EuroIntervention. 2018;13(16):1967-74.

Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails: a proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA. 1997;278(7):579-85.

Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis CD. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2011;343:d6128.

Nylenna M, Fagerbakk F, Kierulf P. Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:53.

Shih TH, Fan X. Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods. 2008;20(3):249-71.

Reinisch JF, Li WY, Yu DC, Walker JW. Authorship conflicts: a study of awareness of authorship criteria among academic plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):303e-10e.

Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280(3):222-4.

Mowatt G, Shirran L, Grimshaw JM, Rennie D, Flanagin A, Yank V, et al. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2769-71.

Dhaliwal U, Singh N, Bhatia A. Awareness of authorship criteria and conflict: survey in a medical institution in India. Medscape Gen Med. 2006;8(4):52.

Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E, Thomas L, Kaner E, Stacy R, et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ. 1997;314(7086):1009-12.

Schroter S, Roberts J, Loder E, Penzien DB, Mahadeo S, Houle TT. Biomedical authors' awareness of publication ethics: an international survey. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):e021282.

Campbell EG, Regan S, Gruen RL, Ferris TG, Rao SR, Cleary PD, et al. Professionalism in medicine: results of a national survey of physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(11):795-802.

Kovacs J. Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo) honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article. J Med Ethics. 2013;39(8):509-12.

Neill US. Publish or perish, but at what cost? J Clin Invest. 2008;118(7):2368.

Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(1):e18.

Ahmed SM, Maurana CA, Engle JA, Uddin DE, Glaus KD. A method for assigning authorship in multiauthored publications. Fam Med. 1997;29(1):42-4.

Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Akazhanov NA, Kitas GD. Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact. Croat Med J. 2014;55(1):61-72.

Smith E, Williams-Jones B. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Sci Engg Ethics. 2012;18(2):199-212.

Macrina FL. Teaching authorship and publication practices in the biomedical and life sciences. Sci Engg Ethics. 2011;17(2):341-54.

Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(2):277-84.

Hren D, Sambunjak D, Marušić M, Marušić A. Medical students’ decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study. Sci Engg Ethics. 2013;19(2):641-51.