General anaesthesia with propofol versus etomidate and cognitive dysfunction in the immediate postoperative period: a randomized double-blind study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20263783Keywords:
Propofol, Etomidate, Postoperative cognitive dysfunction, General anaesthesia, Haemodynamics, Randomized controlled trialAbstract
Background: Propofol and etomidate are commonly used intravenous induction agents for general anaesthesia (GA), but comparative data on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) alongside haemodynamic and adverse-effect profiles are limited. This study compared propofol and etomidate with respect to POCD, haemodynamic stability, and adverse effects.
Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 80 ASA I-II patients aged 18-40 years undergoing short elective surgery (dilation and curettage, or fracture reduction/fixation) under GA were randomized 1:1 to propofol 1 mg/kg (Group P, n=40) or etomidate 0.3 mg/kg (Group E, n=40) for induction. Cognitive function was assessed preoperatively and at 30, 60 and 120 minutes postoperatively using the Tirpude GMC-OMC score. Vitals were recorded intraoperatively (0-20 min) and postoperatively (0-60 min), and adverse effects were noted. Data were analysed using SPSS, with between-group differences and 95% confidence intervals reported; P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: All 80 randomized patients were analysed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Tirpude GMC-OMC scores did not differ significantly between groups at any time point (p>0.05). Intraoperative vitals were significantly more stable in Group E than Group P at most time points (p<0.05). Hypotension was significantly more frequent in Group P (p=0.01); nausea and vomiting were more frequent, though not significantly, in Group E.
Conclusions: Propofol and etomidate produced comparable, clinically insignificant postoperative cognitive change in young, healthy patients undergoing short elective surgery. Etomidate offered superior intraoperative haemodynamic stability and less hypotension, while propofol was associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting.
References
Vuyk J, Sitsen E, Reekers M. Intravenous anesthetics. In: Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, eds. Miller's Anesthesia. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. 2015;822-54.
McKeage K, Perry CM. Propofol: a review of its use in intensive care sedation of adults. CNS Drugs. 2003;17(4):235-72.
Bedford PD. Adverse cerebral effects of anaesthesia on old people. Lancet. 1955;269(6884):259-63.
Monk TG, Price CC. Postoperative cognitive disorders. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17(4):376-81.
Krenk L, Rasmussen LS, Kehlet H. New insights into the pathophysiology of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(8):951-6.
Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, Houx P, Rasmussen H, Canet J, et al. Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: ISPOCD1 study. Lancet. 1998;351(9106):857-61.
Bhatia T, Shriharsh V, Adlakha S, Bisht V, Garg K, Deshpande SN. The trail making test in India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2007;49(2):113-6.
Ghavipeykar H, Moghadam SHP, Vakilian A, Sarkoohi A, Bazmandegan G, Rezaeian M. Comparison of the effects of two drugs-etomidate and propofol-on disorientation and dementia of the elderly after orthopaedic surgery: a double-blind clinical trial. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2020;9:428-32.
Micha G, Tzimas P, Zalonis I, Kotis K, Papadopoulos G, Arnaoutoglou E. Propofol vs sevoflurane anaesthesia on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2016;67(3):129-37.
Goswami U, Babbar S, Tiwari S. Comparative evaluation of the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on cognitive function and memory in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised prospective study. Indian J Anaesth. 2015;59(3):150-5.
Zhang Y, Shan GJ, Zhang YX, Cao SJ, Zhu SN, Li HJ, et al. Propofol compared with sevoflurane general anaesthesia is associated with decreased delayed neurocognitive recovery in older adults. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(3):595-604.
Martin LJ, Oh GH, Orser BA. Etomidate targets alpha5 gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype A receptors to regulate synaptic plasticity and memory blockade. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(5):1025-35.
Jiang YH, Ni XQ, Xiong WW, Wang H, Tan Y, Huang ZH, et al. Different effects of etomidate and propofol on memory in immature rats. Int J Neurosci. 2015;125(1):66-9.
Hadzimesic M, Imamovic S, Uljic V, Hodzic M, Iljazagic-Halilovic F, Hodzic R. Cognitive function recovery rate in early postoperative period: comparison of propofol, sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia. J Health Sci. 2013;3(1):48-54.
Konishi Y, Evered LA, Scott DA, Silbert BS. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after sevoflurane or propofol general anaesthesia in combination with spinal anaesthesia for hip arthroplasty. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018;46(6):596-600.
Zheng H, Zhu Y, Chen K, Shen X. The effect of etomidate or propofol on brainstem function during anesthesia induction: a bispectral index-guided study. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:1941-6.
Pandey AK, Makhija N, Chauhan S, Das S, Kiran U, Bisoi AK, et al. The effects of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. World J Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;18(2):48-53.
Aggarwal S, Goyal VK, Chaturvedi SK, Mathur V, Baj B, Kumar A. A comparative study between propofol and etomidate in patients under general anesthesia. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016;66:237-41.
Meena R, Sharma RS, Ranawat P, Saiyed A, Verma I. Comparison of hemodynamic and serum cortisol levels in response to anesthetic induction with etomidate or propofol in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2017;4(3):345-51.
Karki G, Singh V, Barnwal A, Singh L. A comparative evaluation of hemodynamic characteristics of the three induction agents-etomidate, thiopentone and propofol. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2014;3:9133-41.
Kaushal RP, Vatal A, Pathak R. Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Card Anaesth. 2015;18(2):172-8.
Khare A, Thada B, Samota MK, Mathur V, Singh M. A randomised clinical study to compare the haemodynamic effects of etomidate with propofol during induction of general anaesthesia. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(15):4593-7.
Kabir K, Acharya G, Banjare M, Arora KK, Kumbhare S. A prospective comparative study to compare cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anaesthesia by propofol and etomidate. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2017;4:41-5.
Shah J, Patel I, Guha A. Comparative study of propofol vs etomidate as an induction agent to evaluate hemodynamic changes during induction of anesthesia in controlled hypertensive patients. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2018;22:361-7.
Bharathi G, Hanumantharao G, Reddy KN. Hemodynamic changes in propofol and etomidate general anaesthesia-a comparative study. JMSCR. 2018;6:57-63.
Sudha S. Comparative study of hemodynamic changes during induction of anesthesia between etomidate and propofol. J Anesth Surg. 2019;6:38-43.
Kumar A, Shekhawat KK, Sharma R, Mangwana P. A comparison of propofol and etomidate as anaesthetic agents for elective non-cardiac surgery. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6:3454-60.
Kumar Y. Comparison of propofol and etomidate in patients under general anaesthesia. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2016;3:3488-90.
Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Berens R, Goff D, Kampine JP. Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate. Anesthesiology. 1992;76(5):725-33.
Saini S, Bhardwaj M, Sharma A, Taxak S. A randomised controlled trial to study Bispectral guided induction of general anaesthesia using propofol and etomidate infusion. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64(3):S180-5.
Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, Baez B, Patel P, Bernstein A, et al. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(3):622-8.
Goodchild CS, Serrao JM. Propofol-induced cardiovascular depression: science and art. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(4):641-2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Malvika Patil, Naresh Tirpude

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.