Assessing the effect of layering gingival shade composite resin thickness on the flexural strength of denture base polymer resin material processed by CAD/CAM and injection moulded technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20262866Keywords:
CAD/CAM, Gingival shade composite resin, Injection moldingAbstract
Background: Acrylic resin denture base as materials for dentures, do not mimic the gingival esthetics. Gingival composite resin used for fabrication of denture; it enhances the denture esthetics but affects the material's flexural strength. The study aimed to investigate the flexural strength of denture base polymer resin material CAD/CAM milling and injection molding, as well as the impact of gingival shade composite resin thickness.
Methods: Two types of denture acrylic resins were used as base materials: CAD/CAM pre-polymerized PMMA resin and injection molded acrylic resin. Specimens of both groups, each size 32×10×3 mm, were fabricated. The denture base material was layered with a Gingiva-shade composite resin in thicknesses of 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm, creating subgroups for each material type (n=10). After conditioning of samples, a UTM was used to conduct a 3-point bending test measured the flexural strength and results were analyzed statistically
Results: The compression strengths of the injection-molded acrylic resin samples varied between 125.4±3.115 MPa and 114.3±5.074 MPa, whereas the compression strengths of the CAD-CAM prepolymerized acrylic resin varied between 129.4±3.84 MPa and 119.4±8.16 MPa. All test groups maintained flexural strength values above the ISO 20795-1 minimum requirement of 65 MPa, clinical acceptability for denture fabrication.
Conclusions: CAD/CAM PMMA denture bases exhibited superior flexural compared to injection-molded, both pre and post aging and in different thickness of GSCR layering.
References
Sanjeevan V, Rajagopal P, Venkitachalam R, Aras M. Efficiency of simplified versus traditional denture fabrication methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(3):377-85.
Prpic V, Schauperl Z, Catic A, Dulcic N, Cimic S. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D‐printed, CAD/CAM and conventional denture base materials. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):524-8.
Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):249-56.
Lee S, Hong SJ, Paek J, Pae A, Kwon KR, Noh K. Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD/CAM milling and rapid prototyping method. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(1):55-64.
Park BW, Kim NJ, Lee J, Lee HH. Technique for fabricating individualized dentures with a gingiva-shade composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(5):547-50.
Nayan K, Verma AK, Ali M, Kumari L, Ahmad N. Effect of Thermocycling on the Flexural Strength of Various PMMA Resins Reinforced with Different Fibres: An In vitro Study. Br Med J. 2016;13:1-8.
Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Baptista GT, Moreno A, Andreotti AM, Dekon SF. Effect of thermal cycling and disinfection on microhardness of acrylic resin denture base. J Med Eng Technol. 2013;37(3):203-7.
Sharma P, Garg S, Kalra NM. Effect of denture cleansers on surface roughness and flexural strength of heat cure denture base resin-an in vitro study. J clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):94.
Gharechahi J, Asadzadeh N, Shahabian F, Gharechahi M. Flexural strength of acrylic resin denture bases processed by two different methods. J Dental Res Dental Clin, Dental Prosp. 2014;8(3):148.
Kanazawa M, Inokoshi M, Minakuchi S, Ohbayashi N. Trial of a CAD/CAM system for fabricating complete dentures. Dental Mat J. 2011;30(1):93-6.
Aguirre BC, Chen JH, Kontogiorgos ED, Murchison DF, Nagy WW. Flexural strength of denture base acrylic resins processed by conventional and CAD-CAM methods. The J Prosth Dent. 2020;123(4):641-6.
Einarsdottir ER, Geminiani A, Chochlidakis K, Feng C, Tsigarida A, Ercoli C. Dimensional stability of double-processed complete denture bases fabricated with compression molding, injection molding and CAD-CAM subtraction milling. J Prosthetic Dent. 2020;124(1):116-21.
Patankar RC, More V, Jadhav R, Sabane A, Kadam P, Gachake A. Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of denture base resin materials processed using compression molding technique, injection molding technique and computer-aided design CAM technique: An: in vitro: study. Dental Res J. 2022;1;19(1):100.
Al‐Dwairi ZN, Tahboub KY, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. A comparison of the flexural and impact strengths and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM and conventional heat‐cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). J Prosthet Dent. 2020;29(4):341-9.
Haeberle CB, Khan Z. Construction of a custom‐shaded interim denture using visible light‐cured resin. J Prosthodont. 1997;6(2):153-6.
Patel A. Comparing flexural strength of acrylic processed by three different techniques. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2014;122(2):123-7.
Bedrossian EA, Chung KH. Effect of layering gingiva-shade composite resin on the strength of denture base polymers. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(2):153.
Sharma R. Assessment of flexural strength of denture base resin materials processed using compression molding technique and injection molding technique: A comparative study. Injection molding. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res. 2020;89:35-78.
Dimitrova M, Vlahova A, Hristov I, Kazakova R, Chuchulska B, Kazakov S, et al. Evaluation of water sorption and 71 References solubility of 3D-printed, CAD/CAM milled and PMMA denture base materials subjected to artificial aging. J Compos Sci. 2023;7(8):339.
Kasat S, Gandhi P, Sabane A, Jadhav R, Patil A, Patil S. Evaluation of color stability and shear bond strength of gingival colored composite resin to heat cure denture base resin using compression moulded technique and injection moulded. Int J Sci Study. 2021;9:30-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
