Cost minimization analysis of antihypertensive drugs available in the pharmacy of tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Apurv B. Patel Department of Pharmacology, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Komal M. Patel Department of Pharmacology, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Snehal S. Anturlikar Department of Pharmacology, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Nirav N. Patel Department of Pharmacology, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Sneh H. Dudhia Department of Pharmacology, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Haresh A. Desai Department of Pharmacology, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20261110

Keywords:

Cost minimization, Pharmacoeconomics, Hypertension

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a major preventable cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and poses a significant public health burden in India. Its rising prevalence is linked to urbanization, lifestyle changes, and an aging population. As lifelong treatment is required, medication adherence is crucial, but high out-of-pocket costs can affect it. Despite similar therapeutic effects, antihypertensive drugs show significant inter-brand price variation, highlighting the need for cost-minimization to support rational prescribing.

Methods: A three-month cross-sectional cost-minimization study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital pharmacy to assess inter-brand price variation among oral, single-molecule antihypertensive drugs. Data from pharmacy stock records were analysed using cost difference, cost ratio, and percentage cost variation. Only drugs with multiple brands of the same strength were included.

Results: Enalapril and ramipril showed minimal inter-brand price variation (≤10%), indicating stable pricing. Among ARBs, telmisartan had low variability (≤16%) and remained close to NLEM prices, while losartan showed moderate variation (~56%). Atenolol also maintained stable NLEM-compliant pricing. Verapamil and diltiazem showed minimal variation, whereas amlodipine 5 mg had higher variability (~97%). Among diuretics, frusemide (~84%) and spironolactone (~68%) showed notable variation. Clonidine showed minimal variation at 100 µg but moderate variability at 150 µg (~23%).

Conclusions: This cost-minimization analysis shows significant inter-brand price variation among antihypertensive drugs despite therapeutic equivalence. Greater prescriber awareness, stricter price regulation, and cost-effective prescribing are needed to reduce patient burden and improve adherence.

References

Park K. Park’s textbook of preventive and social medicine. 2025:433-7.

WHO. Global report on hypertension: the race against a silent killer. 2023. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240081062. Accessed on 30 December 2025.

Anchala R, Kannuri NK, Pant H, Khan H, Franco OH, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Hypertension in India systematic review and analysis of prevalence, awareness, and control of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2014;32(6):1170-7.

Ambade M, Sarwal R, Mor N, Kim R, Subramanian SV. Components of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure and Their Relative Contribution to Economic Burden of Diseases in India. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5):e2210040. Available at: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2792292. Accessed on 30 December 2025.

Government of India. Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 2013. Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, New Delhi. 2013. Available at: https://dpc.india.gov.in/orders-notifications. Accessed on 30 December 2025.

Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. 2025. Available at: https://www.medtree.co.in/product/essentials-of-medical-pharmacology-covering-competency-based-nmc-curriculum. Accessed on 30 December 2025.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) 2022. New Delhi. 2022. Available at: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/NLEM-2022.pdf. Accessed on 30 December 2025.

Pharmacoeconomics - an overview. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/nursing-and-health-professions/pharmacoeconomics. Accessed on 30 December 2025.

Beck RK, Kumar R, Kumar V, Kachhap S. Cost analysis study of antihypertensive agents available in India. Indian J Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;7(3):181-8.

Kamath L, Satish GR. Cost variation analysis of antihypertensive drugs available in Indian market: an economic perspective. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7(5):2050-6.

Arya N, Agrawal S, Agrawal M. A study of the cost analysis of various oral antihypertensive drugs available in Indian market. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. 2019;8(8):1850.

Karve AV, Chattar KB. Cost analysis study of oral antihypertensive agents available in Indian market. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2014;3(3):479-83.

Limaye D, Kale M, Chitre N, Deshpande D, Desai R, Limaye V, et al. Cost-effectiveness study of Antihypertensive drugs in Mumbai, India. Int J Life Sci Pharma Res. 2018;8(1):97-103.

Tondare S, Bhave K. Cost analysis of oral antipsychotic drugs available in the Indian market. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2014;29(2):267-70. Available at: https://globalresearchonline.net/journalcontents/v29-2/46. Accessed on 30 December 2025.

Ashiwaju BI, Orikpete OF, Alade EY, Raji A, Adesanya AO, Nwankwo TC. Impact of drug price regulation on patient access to medicines: a systematic review. Matrix Sci Pharma. 2023;7(4):112-8.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-22

How to Cite

Patel, A. B., Patel, K. M., Anturlikar, S. S., Patel, N. N., Dudhia, S. H., & Desai, H. A. (2026). Cost minimization analysis of antihypertensive drugs available in the pharmacy of tertiary care hospital . International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 15(3), 465–471. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20261110

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles