Echoes of adversity with Voriconazole: a retrospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20253365Keywords:
Voriconazole, Adverse drug reactions, Hepatotoxicity, Therapeutic drug monitoring, Diabetes mellitusAbstract
Background: Voriconazole is widely used in managing invasive fungal diseases, but its adverse drug reactions, pose significant clinical challenges. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the frequency, severity, and risk factors of ADRs associated with voriconazole treatment in patients in a tertiary care hospital, focusing on demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, route of administration, and trough drug levels.
Methods: Data of 95 patients who received voriconazole between 2020 and 2025 were retrieved from electronic medical record. Demographic details, treatment indication, comorbidities, mode of administration, and trough plasma concentrations were collected. ADRs were categorized by system organ class, assessed for severity using modified Hartwig -Siegel scale, and causality was determined using the WHO-UMC system. Statistical analysis employed chi-
square tests for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U tests for trough level comparisons, with p<0.05 considered significant.
Results: ADRs occurred in 58 patients (61.1%), hepatobiliary were most frequent (44%). Male patients had a higher ADR rate (54.5%), and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus showed a significantly higher incidence (p=0.008). Cardiovascular comorbidities and thyroid disorders were also significantly associated with ADRs. The intravenous route showed a higher incidence of ADRs compared to oral route. Most reactions were moderately severe (56.8%). A statistically significant relationship was observed between higher trough concentrations and the occurrence of transaminitis.
Conclusion: Voriconazole therapy showed a high rate of moderate ADRs, primarily hepatobiliary. Intravenous route and comorbidities-diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and thyroid disorders-were significant risk factors requiring vigilant monitoring.
Metrics
References
Akçay Ö, Gümüştekin M. Voriconazole-induced hepatotoxicity concise up-to-date review. J Bas Clin Health Sci. 2022;6(1):325-34.
Ertem O, Gümüştekin M. Voriconazole induced hepatotoxicity: concise up to date review. J Basic Clin Health Sci. 2022;6(1):325–34.
Groll AH, Noel AA, Warn PA. Neurologic and hepatic adverse effects of voriconazole. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):124–31.
Xu D, Wang H. Unusual voriconazole hepatotoxicity: hepatotoxic reaction at low trough concentration. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:1479–87.
Zonios DI, Marriet E, Piscitelli SC. Hallucinations during voriconazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/588844
Neofytos D, Fishman JA. Neurologic side effects of voriconazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(3):398–407.
Zrenner B. Visual and neurological adverse effects of triazole therapy: impact of CYP2C19 phenotype. Rev Ital Med Lab. 2024;12(2):105–13.
World Health Organization. The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardized case causality assessment. Uppsala: The Uppsala Monitoring Centre. 2005: 167.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2015.
Ertem MO, Gümüştekin M. Voriconazole-induced hepatotoxicity review: real-world hepatotoxicity rates up to 68%. J Basic Clin Health Sci. 2022;6(1):325–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1051669
Pascual A, Calandra T, Bolay S, Buclin T, Bille J, Marchetti O. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring improves efficacy and safety outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(5):712-9.
Park WB, Kim NH, Kim KH. Voriconazole concentrations and outcome in invasive fungal infections: variability limits predictive value. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;71(7):1786–93.
Lou Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Wang YJ, Wang J, Ma S, et al. Voriconazole-induced liver injury: incidence patterns and risk factors in a retrospective cohort. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025;69(9):487-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00487-25
Mohd Sazlly Lim S, Sinnollareddy M, Sime FB. Challenges in Antifungal Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092878