Outcome measures for determining treatment efficacy in radiculopathy

Shamna K.; Manju C. S.

doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20252593

Authors

Shamna K. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
Manju C. S. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20252593

Keywords:

Cervical radiculopathy, Lumbosacral radiculopathy, Treatment efficacy, Quality of life, Outcome measures

Abstract

Radiculopathy is a neurological disorder caused by any pathology affecting the nerve roots of peripheral nerve system, commonly manifested by pain, paresthesia and motor weakness. Lumbosacral radiculopathy, commonly referred to as low back pain, and cervical radiculopathy, referred to as neck pain, are the two most common forms of the condition. Although one of the main goals of treatment is pain alleviation, this does not always indicate that a patient has entirely recovered. Even after their pain subsides, many patients still struggle with everyday activities and emotional wellbeing. Patient reported outcomes are therefore used to determine if the treatment is effective in terms of functional quality of life of the patient. There are several scales and questionnaires available to evaluate pain and functional disability in both cervical and lumbar radiculopathies. By using these measures, efficacy of treatment may be evaluated more precisely and patient care is enhanced.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Carleton-Bland N. The management of radiculopathy, neurogenic claudication and cauda equina syndrome. Surgery (Oxford). 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2024.05.006

Alexander CE, Weisbrod LJ, Varacallo M. Lumbosacral radiculopathy. InStatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. 2024.

Margetis K, Magnus W, Mesfin FB. StatPearls. Cervical Radiculopathy. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025.

Iyer S, Kim HJ. Cervical radiculopathy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9:272-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9349-4

Bogduk N. Criteria for determining if a treatment for pain works. Interv Pain Med. 2022;1:100125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100125

Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006

Sterling M, Rebbeck T. The neck disability index (NDI). Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(4):271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(05)70017-9

Jorritsma W, Dijkstra PU, de Vries GE, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Detecting relevant changes and responsiveness of neck pain and disability scale and neck disability index. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2550-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2407-8

Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Baird AC, Darden BV. Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale: item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity. Spine. 1999;24(13):1290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199907010-00004

Sterling M, Brentnall D. Patient specific functional scale. Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(1):65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(07)70066-1

Horn KK, Jennings S, Richardson G, Van Vliet D, Hefford C, Abbott JH. The patient-specific functional scale: psychometrics, clinimetrics, and application as a clinical outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(1):30-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3727

Çelenlioğlu AE, Şencan S, Saçaklıdır R, Öztürk EC, Gündüz OH. Cervical Radiculopathy Impact Scale: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Arch Rheumatol. 2022;37(4):574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2022.9639

Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017

Stevens ML, Lin CC, Maher CG. The roland morris disability questionnaire. J Physiother. 2016;62(2):116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.10.003

Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Finch E, Gill C, Moreland J. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther. 1996;76(4):359-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/76.4.359

Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping DL, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine. 1995;20(3):341-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199502000-00016

Aasdahl L, Marchand GH, Gismervik SØ, Myhre K, Fimland MS, Røe C. The fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) does it really measure fear beliefs?. Spine. 2020;45(2):134-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003188

Williamson E. Fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ). Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(2):149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(06)70052-6