Comparative evaluation of two prophylactic intravenous bolus doses of phenylephrine for prevention of spinal-induced hypotension in elective cesarean sections: a prospective and randomized study

Sushma Paccha; Amith Srisha; Raghavendra T. R.

doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20252176

Authors

Sushma Paccha Department of Anaesthesia, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Science, Karnataka, India
Amith Srisha Department of Anaesthesia, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Science, Karnataka, India
Raghavendra T. R. Department of Anaesthesia, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Science, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20252176

Keywords:

Phenylephrine, Hypotension, Cesarean section, Spinal anesthesia, Bradycardia, Obstetric anesthesia

Abstract

Background: Hypotension is a common and clinically significant complication associated with spinal anesthesia during cesarean section, often persisting despite standard preventive strategies such as fluid preloading and left uterine displacement. Vasopressors like phenylephrine are routinely employed to counteract the hemodynamic instability, yet limited data exist comparing different fixed bolus doses of phenylephrine for prophylaxis against spinal-induced hypotension in obstetric anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of two intravenous bolus doses of phenylephrine-150 micrograms and 200 micrograms-administered immediately following spinal anesthesia, in preventing maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery.

Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted at Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, India involving 60 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section. Group A received 150 µg and group B received 200 µg phenylephrine IV bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters, incidence of hypotension and bradycardia, requirement of rescue boluses, and Apgar scores were recorded.
Results: The incidence of hypotension was 16.6% in both groups. Group B showed a significantly higher incidence of bradycardia (43.3%) compared to group A (20%, p<0.05). Group A demonstrated better hemodynamic stability with fewer rescue interventions. Neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: A 150 µg bolus of phenylephrine is as effective as 200 µg in preventing hypotension following spinal anesthesia in cesarean delivery, with fewer adverse effects. It is recommended as the preferred dose for prophylaxis.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Reynolds F. Regional anesthesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(21):1555-63.

Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. A dose–response meta-analysis of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(2):483-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000096183.49619.FC

Morgan P. Hypotension and spinal anesthesia in obstetrics: a lesson from history. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42(5):384-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015105

Corke BC, Datta S, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB, Alper MH. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. The influence of hypotension on neonatal outcome. Anesth Analg. 1982;61(8):647-50.

Dyer RA, Reed AR, van Dyk D. Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(5):802-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000311153.84687.c7

Balki M, Carvalho JCA. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14(3):230-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.004

Ngan Kee WD. Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anesthesia for cesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23(3):304-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e328337ffc6

Cooper DW, Carpenter M, Mowbray P, Desira WR, Ryall DM, Kokri MS. Fetal and maternal effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(6):1582-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200212000-00034

Saravanan S, Kocarev M, Wilson RC, Watkins E, Columb MO, Lyons G. Equivalent dose of ephedrine and phenylephrine in the prevention of post-spinal hypotension in cesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(1):95-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei265

Veeser M, Hofmann T, Roth R, Klöhr S, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Vasopressors for the management of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section. Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(7):810-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02646.x

Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(4):469-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh088

Habib AS. Choice of vasopressor for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: do we have the answer? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20(4):353-7.

Stewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, Hignett R, Jones T, Columb M. The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(5):1230-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f2eae1

Allen TK, Muir HA, George RB. A survey of obstetric anesthesia practice in Ontario: recommendations for maternal hypotension management. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(10):929-36.

Thomas DG, Robson SC, Redfern N, Hughes D, Boys RJ. Randomised trial of bolus phenylephrine or ephedrine for maintenance of arterial pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76(1):61-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/76.1.61

Hall PA, Bennett A, Wilkes MP, Lewis M. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: Comparison of phenylephrine and ephedrine. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73:471-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/73.4.471

Wright RG, Shnider SM. Hypotension and regional anaesthesia in obstetrics. Anaesthesia for Obstetrics. 3rd ed. Williams and Wilkins. 1993;397-404.

Das S, Mukhopadhyay S, Mandal M, Mandal S, Basu SR. A comparative study of infusions of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and combination on maternal hemodynamics in elective caesarean section. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(6):578-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.90612

Sharma R, Maitra N, Niyogi M. Comparative study of phenylephrine and mephentermine for hypotension during spinal anaesthesia. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2009;19(2):NA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5580/1ab6

Moran DH, Perillo M, LaPorta RF, Bader AM, Datta S. Phenylephrine in the prevention of spinal-induced hypotension. J Clin Anesth. 1991;3(4):302-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(91)90224-B

Mercier FJ, Riley ET, Fredericson WL, Cohen SE. Phenylephrine added to prophylactic ephedrine infusion during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:668-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200109000-00020

Tailor JC, Tunstall ME. Dosage of phenylephrine in spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1991;46(4):314-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb11507.x

Sushma N. Comparing two different prophylactic intravenous bolus doses of phenylephrine for preventing hypotension after subarachnoid block in cesarean sections-a clinical study. RGUHS Thesis Obstetric anaesthesia. 2016.