An observational comparative study on the immediate, deferred, and no use of antiepileptics in the management of seizure

Authors

  • Himangi Shrestha Doctor of Pharmacy, Karnataka College of Pharmacy, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India
  • Athira Krishnan Department of Pharmacy Practice, Karnataka College of Pharmacy, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India
  • Balakeshwa Ramaiah Department of Pharmacy Practice, Karnataka College of Pharmacy, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20250484

Keywords:

Antiepileptics, Immediate, Deferred, Seizure control, Recurrence

Abstract

Background: The rationale for starting AEDs in patients with seizure and early epilepsy is still unclear. The decision to start and stop the drugs in patients with single seizures remains controversial. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and short-term outcome of the immediate, deferred, and no use of AEDs in patients presenting with seizure.

Methods   This observational study, included 87 patients with either gender or age group with first or multiple seizures to investigate immediate, deferred, or no AED use. Detailed demographics, history, and diagnostic test reports were recorded. Drug use patterns and outcomes of seizure recurrence and safety were evaluated.

Results: Out of 87 patients (56 male, 31 female), there were 26 paediatrics, 47 adults, and 15 elderly. Immediate AED treatment was given to 75%, 16% deferred, and 9% received no/SOS AED. Levetiracetam was commonly prescribed (78% in ED, 86% in wards, 63% at discharge). For immediate AEDs: 49% had good seizure control, 25% had recurrence, and 9% had breakthrough seizures. Deferred AEDs showed 36% good control/recurrence and 7% breakthrough. Without AEDs: 63% had good control and 25% had recurrence. AEs were higher in the immediate AED group (42%) vs. deferred (15%).

Conclusions: The study indicates that immediate use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) reduces short-term seizure recurrence but may increase adverse effects. In cases of reversible causes, it may be best to forgo AEDs. Decisions regarding AED therapy should be tailored to the patient's preferences and risk considerations.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rao VR, Lowenstein DH. Seizures and Epilepsy. In: Loscalzo J, Fauci A, Kasper D, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson JL, eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 21ed. McGraw-Hill; 2022.

Kang PB, Morrison L, Iannaccone ST, Graham RJ, Bönnemann CG, Rutkowski A, et al. Evidence-based guideline summary: evaluation, diagnosis, and management of congenital muscular dystrophy: report of the guideline development subcommittee of the American academy of neurology and the practice issues review panel of the American association of neuromuscular & electrodiagnostic medicine. Neurology. 2015;84(13):1369-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001416

Kim KT, Kim DW, Yang KI. Refining general principles of antiepileptic drug treatments for epilepsy. J Clin Neurol. 2020;16(3):383-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2020.16.3.383

Tomson T, Zelano J, Dang YL, Perucca P. The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in adults. Epileptic Dis. 2023;25(5):649-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/epd2.20093

Marson AG. When to start antiepileptic drug treatment and with what evidence? Epilepsia. 2008;49(9):3-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01920.x

Costa B, Vale N. Virus-Induced Epilepsy vs. Epilepsy patients acquiring viral infection: unravelling the complex relationship for precision treatment. Int J Molec Sci. 2024;25(7):3730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073730

Chadwick DW. The treatment of the first seizure: The benefits. Epilepsia. 2008;49(1):26-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01446.x

Pal A, Prusty SK, Sahu PK, Swain T. Drug utilization pattern of antiepileptic drugs: A pharmacoepidemiologic and pharmacovigilance study in a tertiary teaching hospital in India. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2011;4(1):96-99.

Magar YB, Hiray RS, Ghongane BB. Utilization pattern of antiepileptic drugs and their adverse effects in tertiary healthcare and teaching hospital. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2018;8(1):39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20185119

Sharma S, Chen Z, Rychkova M, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of immediate and delayed treatment in epilepsy diagnosed after one or multiple seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;117:107880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107880

Marson A, Jacoby A, Johnson A, Kim L, Gamble C, Chadwick D. Immediate versus deferred antiepileptic drug treatment for early epilepsy and single seizures: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9476):2007-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66694-9

Olmes DG, Hamer HM. The debate: Treatment after the first seizure–The PRO. Seizure. 2017;49:90-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2017.04.008

Steinhoff BJ. The debate: Treatment after the first seizure-the contra. Seizure. 2017;49:92-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.002

Downloads

Published

2025-02-25

How to Cite

Shrestha, H., Krishnan, A., & Ramaiah, B. (2025). An observational comparative study on the immediate, deferred, and no use of antiepileptics in the management of seizure. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 14(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20250484

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles