A prospective study on identification, assessment, and spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions at a tertiary care hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20250483Keywords:
Adverse drug reaction, Pharmacovigilance, Causality assessment, Modified hartwig and seigel severity assessment scaleAbstract
Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) significantly contribute to global morbidity and mortality. Voluntary ADR reporting is crucial for the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPi), which identifies and quantifies medication risks. This study monitors ADRs from various departments of a tertiary care hospital, assessing them for causality, preventability, and severity before reporting to the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC).
Methods: This prospective study was conducted over six months at a tertiary care hospital, which is an approved ADR Monitoring Centre (AMC). Data was collected by PharmD students, who assessed each ADR for causality, severity, and preventability using the World Health Organization (WHO) scale, Hartwig’s severity scale, and Schumock and Thornton scales. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
Results: A total of 358 suspected ADRs were evaluated. Most reactions (87.98%) were classified as "moderate" in severity, with 45.53% considered not preventable. The majority of ADRs were categorized as probable (84.07%), with Class J drugs (Anti-infectives) being the most associated (29.89%). Most reports came from General Medicine (53.35%), and the primary affected organ systems were metabolic and nutritional (21%).
Conclusions: Most ADRs in this study were caused by antimicrobials, highlighting the need for careful prescribing and patient monitoring. Type A ADRs were often underreported, with healthcare professionals focusing primarily on Type B and H reactions. This study emphasizes the importance of voluntary ADR reporting and the vital role of clinical pharmacists in assessing and documenting these reactions.
Metrics
References
World Health Organization. International drug monitoring: the role of national centres, report of a WHO meeting. World Health Organization. 1972.
Ramesh M, Pandit J, Parthasarathi G. Adverse drug reactions in a South Indian hospital - Their severity and cost involved. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12(8):687-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.871
Shamna M, Dilip C, Ajmal M. A prospective study on Adverse Drug Reactions of antibiotics in a tertiary care hospital. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(4):303-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2013.06.004
Saini VK. IJPhS-77-687. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015;3:1-7.
Saini VK, Sewal RK, Ahmad Y, Medhi B. Prospective observational study of adverse drug reactions of anticancer drugs used in cancer treatment in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015;77(6):687-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.174990
Ganesan S, Sandhiya S, Subrahmanyam D. Frequency of ADRs and their economic impact in a tertiary care public sector hospital in South India. SBV J Basic, Clin Appl Heal Sci. 2020;3(1):23-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10082-02235
Lihite RJ, Lahkar M, Das S. A study on adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care hospital of Northeast India. Alexandria J Med. 2017;53(2):151-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2016.05.007
Kalaiselvan V, Thota P, Singh GN. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India: Recent developments and future perspectives. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016;48(6):624-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.194855
Thakare V, Dongerkery K, Langade D. Prospective observational study to evaluate adverse drug reactions pattern in a tertiary level teaching hospital. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019;(1):14-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0102811032019
James J, Rani J. a Prospective Study of Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2019;13(1):89-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2020.v13i1.36028
WHO. The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardized case causality assessment. Uppsala Uppsala Monit Cent. 2014;48(3):194-203.
Shajahan J, Parathoduvil AA, Purushothaman S. An analysis of seriousness, predictability and preventability of adverse drug reactions reported at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kerala, India: a retrospective observational record-based study. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2018;7(12):2433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20184861
Daulat MP, Singh P, Raj B. A prospective study of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2018;7(10):1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20183931
Prajapati K, Desai M, Shah S, Panchal J, Kapadia J, Dikshit R. An analysis of serious adverse drug reactions at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Perspect Clin Res. 2016;7(4):181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.192044
Arulmani R, Rajendran SD, Suresh B. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a secondary care hospital in South India. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65(2):210-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02993.x
Acharya T, Mehta D, Shah H, Dave J. Pharmacovigilance study of adverse cutaneous drug reactions in a tertiary care hospital. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;3(1):75-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2013.3.75-81