Prospective observational study of blood pressure variation and malnutrition using body composition monitor in hemodialysis patient in tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Shuaib Hussain Department of Pharmacy Practice Karnataka College of Pharmacy, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Blessy K. George Department of Pharmacy Practice Karnataka College of Pharmacy, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Balakeswa Ramaiah Department of Pharmacy Practice Karnataka College of Pharmacy, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20250478

Keywords:

Body composition monitor, Blood pressure variation, Complications, Dialysis management, Hemodialysis, Malnutrition

Abstract

Background: Blood pressure (BP) variations and malnutrition are critical concerns in hemodialysis patients, significantly impacting morbidity, mortality and quality of life. Accurate assessments using tools such as the Body Composition Monitor (BCM) can guide effective interventions to improve outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate BP variations and malnutrition in hemodialysis patients using BCM, analysed dialysis-related complications and assess the impact of targeted interventions on patient outcomes.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 125 hemodialysis patients at a tertiary care hospital. Data on BP variations, nutritional status and complications were collected using BCM and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36) questionnaire. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions were tailored based on findings. Follow-up data assessed changes in body composition and complication rates.

Results: Hypertension was the most prevalent BP variation (63.2%), followed by hypotension (26.4%) and intradialytic hypotension (IDH) (8%). Malnutrition affected 24.8% of patients, primarily older males. During follow-up, patients with normal indices of lean tissue (28 to 54), fat tissue (28 to 54) and BMI (28 to 54) increased significantly. The most common dialysis-related complications were cramps (43.2%), itching (28%) and edema (20.8%). Targeted interventions, including nutritional supplementation and BCM-guided fluid management, reduced complications and improved nutritional and hemodynamic parameters.

Conclusions: The study highlights the high prevalence of hypertension and malnutrition among hemodialysis patients and underscores the utility of BCM in optimizing patient management. BCM-guided interventions were associated with improved nutritional status and reduced complications, emphasizing the need for individualized care strategies. Further multicenter studies are recommended to validate these findings and expand their applicability.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Frank, Matthew G. annis, Watkins M. HHS Public Access. Physiol Behav. 2019;97(80):678–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2019.05.014

Mamat R, Kong NCT, Ba’in A, Shah SA, Cader R, Wong V, et al. Assessment of body fluid status in hemodialysis patients using the body composition monitor measurement technique. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(19):2879–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04091.x

Tian M, Zha Y, Qie S, Lin X, Yuan J. Association of Body Composition and Intradialytic Hypotension in Hemodialysis Patients. Blood Purif. 2020;49(3):334–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000504245

Keane DF, Baxter P, Lindley E, Moissl U, Pavitt S, Rhodes L, et al. The Body Composition Monitor: A flexible tool for routine fluid management across the haemodialysis population. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2017;3(3):45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aa6f45

Hou GC, Gan H, Sun XL, Li J. Use of body composition measurements to guide the assessment of dry weight in anuric dialysis patients: improvements in blood pressure control. Biochem Biop Rep. 2019;17(1):191–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.01.005

NICE. The BCM-body composition monitor for managing fluid in people ha having ving dialysis. 2015;5750:1–44.

Rosenberger J, Kissova V, Majernikova M, Straussova Z, Boldizsar J. Body composition monitor assessing malnutrition in the hemodialysis. population independently predicts mortality. J Ren Nutr. 2014;24(3):172–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2014.01.002

Valtuille R, Casos ME, Fernandez EA, Guinsburg A, Marelli C. Nutritional markers and body composition in hemodialysis patients. Int Sch Res Not. 2015;2015:1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/695263

Agarwal R, Flynn J, Pogue V, Rahman M, Reisin E, Weir M. Assessment and management of hypertension in hemodialysis patients: A call to action. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(3):366-78.

Kovesdy CP, Kopple JD, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Management of protein-energy wasting in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: Reconciling low protein intake with nutritional therapy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(4):1121-7.

Fouque D, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple J. A proposed nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for protein-energy wasting in acute and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2008;73(4):391-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002585

Flythe JE, Xue H, Lynch KE, Curhan GC, Brunelli SM. Association of mortality risk with various definitions of intradialytic hypotension. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(3):724-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2014020222

Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Humphreys MH, Kopple JD. Reverse epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors in maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2003;63(3):793-808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00803.x

Downloads

Published

2025-02-25

How to Cite

Hussain, S., George, B. K., & Ramaiah, B. (2025). Prospective observational study of blood pressure variation and malnutrition using body composition monitor in hemodialysis patient in tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 14(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20250478

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles