Perception, knowledge and attitudinal assessment of drug promotional literature among second year, medical undergraduate students: a questionnaire-based study

Sweety Ramesh Deikar; Lois James Samuel

doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232572

Authors

Sweety Ramesh Deikar Department of Pharmacology, Goa Medical College, Bambolim, Goa, India
Lois James Samuel Department of Pharmacology, Goa Medical College, Bambolim, Goa, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232572

Keywords:

Drug promotion literature, Questionnaire-based, 2nd year undergraduate students, Rational use, Prescribing pattern of doctors

Abstract

Background: WHO defines drug promotion literature (DPL) as “all informational and persuasive activities by manufacturers, the effect of which is to induce the prescription, supply, purchase and/or use of medicinal drugs”. Benefit driven marketing of new drugs by drug companies may lead to erroneous prescription due to insufficient understanding, knowledge of safety and therapeutic benefits of the drugs in the community. All these promotional activities influence the prescribing pattern of doctors. 2nd year of undergraduate medical course is the appropriate time to educate the medical undergraduate students about fundamentals of DPL and to train them accordingly for improving their prescribing behaviour eventually.

Methods: A prospective questionnaire-based study was conducted in Goa Medical College. The study participants consisted of 150 II-year undergraduate medical students. Approval from Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained. The feedback forms were collected from the students after they were completed and data was analysed and represented as counts and percentages.

Results: Among respondents 36% of students opined that the quality of details provided by medical representatives is biased and too commercial followed by others. 40.7% of students were of the view that the most important intervention needed to reduce the impact of drug promotion on prescribing was to formulate policies and guidelines for the health care authorities.

Conclusions: Promotional activities by manufacturers influence the attitude and prescribing pattern of doctors. So, it is of utmost importance to train medical graduates in order to enable them to develop the skill of critical analysis of DPL and consequently rational prescribing.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Agrawal R, Jaiswal MK, Sharma SK, Sharma R. Knowledge and attitudinal survey of drug promotional literature among second year undergraduate students: A questionnaire based study. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2019;8:2548-52.

Jyothi DB. A questionnaire-based survey on knowledge and attitude towards drug promotional literature among second year under graduate students at tertiary care hospital. Nat J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;10(03):257-61.

Jacob NT. Drug promotion practices: A review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(8):1659-67.

Norris P, Herxheimer A, Lexchin J, Mansfield P. Drug promotion. The Netherlands; WHO, 2005. Available at: https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/ s8109e/s8109e.pdf. Accessed on 12 July 2023.

Fogel M. Deception by Design: Pharmaceutical Promotion in the Third World. CMAJ. 1995;153(12):1753.

Lexchin J. Should doctors prescribe new drugs? Int J Risk Saf Medi. 2002;15:213-22.

OPPI Code of Pharmaceutical Practices. Mumbai: Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, 2018. Available at: https://www.indiaoppi.com/sites/defaultfiles/oppicodeof pharmaceutical producers of India. Accessed on 23 July 2022.

Sharma S, Akhoon N, Moe HW, Nair DR, Shashidhar V. A study of perceptions and exposure of drug promotional literature among clinicians in a teaching hospital. Perspect Clin Res. 2021;12(3):140-5.

Dixit R, Patil P, Rajesh CS, Madhuri S, Mane A. A drug promotional activities as a source of medical information and its influence on prescribing. Int J Pharm Biolog Sci. 2014;4(3):113-9.

Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA. 2000;283(3):373-80.

Narendran R, Narendranathan M. Influence of pharmaceutical marketing on prescription practices of physicians. J Indian Med Assoc. 2013;111(1):47-50.

Cardarelli R, Licciardone JC, Taylor LG. A cross-sectional evidence-based review of pharmaceutical promotional marketing brochures and their underlying studies: is what they tell us important and true? BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:13.

Mali SN, Dudhgaonkar S, Bachewar NP. Evaluation of rationality of promotional drug literature using World Health Organization guidelines. Indian J Pharmacol. 2010;42(5):267-72.

Roy N, Madhiwalla N, Pai SA. Drug promotional practices in Mumbai: a qualitative study. Indian J Med Ethics. 2007;4(2):57-61.

Rode SB, Salankar HV, Katole NT, Deshkar AT, Dadmal AA, Parate SV. Critical Appraisal of Drug Promotional Literature in Accordance with WHO Guidelines. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e27644.

Sawhney V, Sawhney N. Study of promotional drug literature among doctors in a teaching hospital in Northern India. Int J Res Pharmacol Pharmacotherap. 2019;8(3):343-7.

Jindal M, Choudhary P, Sharma RK. Analysis of drug promotional literature and its abidance to WHO guideline. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2019;8(11):2502-5.