Changing trends with respect to standard of methodological reporting and type of research published in a pharmacology journal over a decade: a descriptive study


  • Mangala Bhaskar Murthy Department of Pharmacology, GMC, Miraj, India
  • Bhaskar Krishnamurthy Murthy Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GMC, Miraj, India
  • Shreyas Ramachandra Burute Department of Pharmacology, GMC, Miraj, India
  • Praveenkumar T. Patil Department of Pharmacology, GMC, Dhule, India
  • Sunita J. Ramanand Department of Pharmacology, GMC, Miraj, India



Research articles, Quality of studies, Randomized controlled trials, CONSORT


Background: Criticisms against Indian research include features like redundant research topic, low quality methodological reporting leading to less credible results and poor statistical rigor to mention a few. A ‘publication audit’ of previously published studies in terms of research trend and standards of methodological reporting will help us to identify problem areas so that rectifications if required may be undertaken.

Methods: This was a descriptive study conducted on the research articles published in a journal of Pharmacology during years 2005 and 2015. Comparison was done to see any differences in type of studies published and also to assess their standards of methodological reporting on the basis of a predesigned checklist. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data.

Results: The proportion of full length research articles published increased from 30.97% in the year 2005 to 46.58% in the year 2015, the number of studies involving human beings increased to 26.86% (as compared to 8% in 2005), studies using drugs as active principle doubled in 2015 as compared to 2005. Focus on area of research shifted from inflammation and wound healing in 2005 to central nervous system in 2015. With respect to standard of reporting, albeit some improvement in the studies published in 2015, some missing links still exist.

Conclusions: There is scope for improvement in terms of report of study designs, justification of sample size and adherence to CONSORT (Consolidated statement for reporting randomized controlled trails) statement while reporting results of randomised controlled trials.


Prathap T, Aneesh TG, Richard K, Jabez PB. Reporting of methods was better in the clinical trials registry-India than in Indian journal publications. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2013;66(1):10-22.

Strech D, Soltmann B, Weikert B, Bauer M, Pfennig A. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(9):1214-21.

Charan J, Chaudhari M, Jackson R, Mhaskar R, Reljic T, Kumar A. Comparison of methodological quality of positive versus negative comparative studies published in Indian medical journals: a systematic review BMJ Open. 2015;5(6):e007853.

Kannan S, Deshpande SP, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. Policy of reviewing statistics in Indian medical and surgical journals. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4(2):139-40.

Seema R, Sanjay M. Publish or perish: where are we heading? J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(2):87-9.

Jin Z, Yu D, Zhang L, Meng H, Lu J, Gao Q, et al. A retrospective survey of research design and statistical analyses in selected Chinese medical journals in 1998 and 2008. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10822.

Mahesh NB, Supriya SB, Renuka PM. Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: a review of four Indian journals. Perspect Clin Res. 2014;5:129-33.

Hassan S, Yellur R, Subramani P, Adiga P, Gokhale M, Iyer MS, et al. Research design and statistical methods in Indian Medical Journals: a retrospective survey. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0121268.

Charan J, Saxena D, Yadav P, Kantharia ND. Quality of antidepressant drugs research articles published in Indian medical journals. Indian J Psychol Med. 2011;33(2):141-4.

Qureshi J, Sud A, Vakil N. Funding source and conflict of interest disclosures by authors and editors in gastroenterology specialty journals revisited. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(6):690-5.

Julie P, An-Wen C, Asbjørn H, Elisabeth F, Douglas GA, Peter CG. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study BMJ. 2005;330:1049.

Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Weeks L, Peters J, Kober T, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:MR000030.

Can OS, Yilmaz AA, Hasdogan M, Alkaya F, Turhan SC, Can MF, et al. Has the quality of abstracts for randomized controlled trials improved since the release of consolidated standards of reporting trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anesthesia journals. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(7):485-92.

Reema BA, Muaz AM, Reem EH, Razan HK, Ranim AC, Tehreem AK, et al. Comparative analysis of quantity and quality of biomedical publications in Gulf Cooperation Council countries from 2011-2013. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(9):1103-9.




How to Cite

Murthy, M. B., Murthy, B. K., Burute, S. R., Patil, P. T., & Ramanand, S. J. (2017). Changing trends with respect to standard of methodological reporting and type of research published in a pharmacology journal over a decade: a descriptive study. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 5(4), 1331–1336.



Original Research Articles