Comparison of small group discussions and didactic lectures in pharmacology for medical undergraduate students
Keywords:Didactic lecture, Small group discussion, Teaching learning method
Background: Conventionally, in most medical colleges, didactic lectures form a major part of teaching, however this method of teaching has many limitations. There has been a paradigm shift in teaching learning methods which now favor enhanced student involvement. Small group discussion (SGD) is one such method which has been frequently compared with didactic lectures. This study aims to compare these two teaching learning methods.
Methods: This was a randomized prospective cross sectional, comparative study carried out with 120 second MBBS students of Pharmacology. The students were randomly divided into two groups. Group A was taught by conventional didactic method and group B learnt the same topic by SGD method. For the next topic there was a crossover. After a week students appeared for a test and were asked to fill a 5-point Likert scale perception analysis form.
Results: The post-test average scores for didactic lecture were 6.42±2.43 and for SGD were 6.15±2.70 (p value 0.4167). About 88% students agree (50% strongly agree and 38% agree) that SGD is motivating, 85% student agree that SGD is interesting form of learning however 26% student feel that some student dominated in the SGD and 33% student felt more comfortable in lectures.
Conclusions: The perception analysis showed that majority of the students found SGD better than didactic lectures in terms of learning, involvement, clearing doubts, increasing self-confidence however analysis of the test scores showed no statistically significant difference amongst the marks obtained after didactic lectures or small group discussion.
Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B. Goodman and Gilman's Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12th ed. China: Mc Graw Hill Companies, Inc. 2011.
Bhutani N, Arora D, Bhutani N. A Comparison of Effectiveness of Interactive Methods over Traditional Methods in Teaching Biochemistry to Undergraduate Medical Students. Int J Rec Innov Med Clin Res. 2020;2(2):57-63.
Sahu PK, Nayak S, Rodrigues V. Medical students' perceptions of small group teaching effectiveness in hybrid curriculum. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:30.
Bhattacharya N, Habib N, Rashid M, Sugathan S, Afrose T, Kottakal EN. Combination of SGT (small group teaching) and PAL (peer assisted learning) approach to facilitate learning among MBBS students from a private university in Malaysia during pre-clinical years. Malaysian J Public Health Med. 2020;20(3):79-84.
Verma L, Chetan KR, Bansal A. Comparison of Small Group Discussions and Didactic Lectures in Forensic Medicine. Indian J Legal Med. 2019;1(2):49-54.
Savkar MK, Mariswamy V, Gangadhar M. Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology. Int J Basic Clin Sci. 2016;6(2).
Chandelkar UK, Rataboli PV, Kulkarni MS. Assessment of impact of small group teaching over didactic lectures and self-directed learning among second year BDS students in general and dental pharmacology in Goa medical college. Pharmacol Online. 2014;3:51-7.
Padugupati S, Joshi KP, Yamini D, Chary RSS, Sarma DVHS. Educational outcomes of small group discussion versus traditional lecture among first year undergraduate medical students. J Educ Technol Health Sci. 2017;4(3):93-6.
Arias A, Scott R, Peters OA, McClain E, Gluskin AH. Educational Outcomes of Small-Group Discussion Versus Traditional Lecture Format in Dental Students’ Learning and Skills Acquisition. J Dent Educ. 2016;80(4):459-65.
Majhi P, Sulakhe R. Didactic lectures and small group discussions among undergraduate students in a medical college - A comparative study. J Educational Res Med Teach. 2014;2(2):10-1.
Joshi KP, Robins M, Reddy MY. Perception and preferences of teaching and learning methods in community medicine: a cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(7):2821-4.
Chilwant KS. Comparison of two teaching methods, structured interactive lectures and conventional lectures. Biomed Res. 2012;23(3):363-6.
Miller CJ, McNear J, Metz MJ. A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37:347-55.