DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20164120

Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology

Madhav Kashinath Savkar, Vinaya Mariswamy, Manu Gangadhar

Abstract


Background: The drawbacks associated with didactic lectures can be overcome by small group discussions (SGDs) which involve a limited number of participants, produce interaction, allow better understanding of concepts, and critical thinking. The objectives of our study were to assess the preferences of 2nd year medical undergraduates between the didactic lectures and the SGDs and the enhancement of knowledge by SGDs in Pharmacology.

Methods: This is a mixed (qualitative and quantitative), interventional study, conducted in 2nd MBBS students (n=130). After obtaining the informed consent and Institutional Ethics Committee clearance, the pre and post-tests (20 MCQs) before and after the didactic lectures were conducted. Second set of pre and post-tests with different and validated MCQs of the same topic were conducted before and after 3 SGDs. The preferences of the students between these 2 methods were also assessed using 10 parameters. The results were analysed by paired and unpaired’t’ test and percentages.

Results: The means (Standard Deviation [SD]) of the scores obtained by the students before and after didactic lectures were 7.53 (2.27) and 9.02 (2.92), respectively and before and after SGDs were 8.2 (1.95) and 11.42 (2.74), respectively. When the means of post-tests of lectures and SGDs were compared using unpaired’t-test' the difference was extremely significant with the P value of <0.005. Students showed preferences for SGDs over lectures in all 10 parameters.

Conclusions: More SGDs should be incorporated in the subject of pharmacology, along with didactic lectures to enhance the active learning, communication skills and critical thinking among the students.


Keywords


Didactic lectures, Enhancement, Knowledge, Small group discussions, Pharmacology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B. Goodman and Gilman's Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics.12th ed. China: Mc Graw Hill Companies,Inc; 2011.

Cantillon P. Teaching Large Groups. In ABC of Learning and Teaching in Medicine. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2003:15-18.

Bobby Z, Nandeesha H, Sridhar MG, Soundravally R, Setiya S, Babu MS, et al. Identification of mistakes and their correction by small group discussion as a revision exercise at the end of teaching module in Biochemistry. Natl Med J Ind. 2014;27:22-3.

Hafezimoghadam P, Farahmand S, Farsi D, Zare M, Abbasi S. A Comparative Study of Lecture and Discussion Methods in the Education of Basic Life Support and Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support for Medical Students. Tr J Emerg Med. 2013;13(2):59-63.

Hackathorn J, Erin D. Solomon, Blankmeyer KL, Tennial RE, Garczynsk AM. Learning by Doing: An Empirical Study of Active Teaching Techniques. The Journal of Effective Teaching. 2011;11(2):40-54.

Griffiths S. Teaching and learning in small groups. In A Handbook of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge publications; 2009:72-81.

Chandelkar UK. Rataboli PV. Kulkarni MS. Assessment of impact of small group teaching over didactic lectures and self-directed learning among second year BDS students in general and dental pharmacology in Goa medical college. Pharmacology Online. 2014;3:51-7.

Qamar MR, Ahmad A, Niaz K. Learning through small group discussion versus didactic lectures. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2015;65(3):386-90.

Rathnakar UP, Ullal SD, Pai PG, Rajeshwari S, Pemminati S, Shivaprakash G, et al. Is small group teaching among the undergraduate dental students really effective? Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011;5(4):822-5.

Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC). An environmental scan of best practices in public health undergraduate medical education: Report 5: Strengths, weaknesses, and applicability of teaching methods. 2009.

Hoffman M, Wilkinson JE, Xu J, Weicha J. The perceived effects of faculty presence Vs absence on small group learning and group dynamics: Quasi experimental study. BMC medical education. 2014;14:258.

Raut SS, Shreechakradhar M, More SR, Rathod VS, Gujar VM et al. Developing Competencies of Medical Students Using Group Discussion as TL Method. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2014;13(1):24-7.

Meo SA. Basic steps in establishing effective small group teaching sessions in medical schools. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(4):1071-6.

Hommes J, Arah OA, Grave W, Schuwirth LWT, Scherpbier A JJA, Bos GMJ. Medical students perceive better group learning processes when large classes are made to seem small. www.PLOS one.org. 2014;9(4):e93328.

Walton H. Small group methods in medical teaching. Medical Education. 1997,31, 459-64.

Hameed S, Khalid T, Aslam S, Ahmad M, Wattoo F. Small group discussion - Impact on student's test scores in an undergraduate pathology course. JUMDC. 2013;4(1):17-21.

Majhi P, Sulakhe R. Didactic lectures and small group discussions among undergraduate students in a medical college - A comparative study. J Educational Res Med Teach. 2014;2(2):10-11.

Botelho MG, O’Donnell D. Assessment of the use of problem-orientated, small-group discussion for learning of a fixed prosthodontic, simulation laboratory course. Br Dent J. 2001;191:630-6.

Kulkarni S, Chillarige C. Evaluation of small group discussion as a teaching method in Microbiology for second year medical students in BRIMS, Bidar: A pilot study. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2015;4(9):1001-3.