A prospective randomized single blind study to compare the safety and efficacy of propronolol and topiramate in migraine prophylaxis

Authors

  • Keelu Rajkumar Department of Pharmacology, Shanthiram Medical College, Nandyal, Kurnool district, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Pothuru Anil Kumar Department of Pharmacology, Viswabharathi Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20211027

Keywords:

Migraine, Topiramate, Propranolol

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the Safety and efficacy of propranolol and topiramate in migraine prophylaxis.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, single blind study which was conducted for six months in 100 patients of outpatient department of Neurology Government General Hospital, Guntur.

Results: Among the hundred patients fifty were allotted to group A – propranolol 40 mg bd and fifty were allotted to group B- topiramate 25 mg bd. statistically there is no significant differences were found between the treatment groups of Propranolol and topiramate for the reduction in mean duration and severity of migraine headaches. Both Propranolol and topiramate have p value<0.001. This shows that both propranolol and topiramate have significantly decreased in the mean duration and severity of migraine attacks. However, in the present study topiramate is slightly more efficacious in reducing the symptoms of migraine frequency per month (days), duration and severity (visual analogue scale- VAS score) from baseline at the end of six months. The decrease in frequency of migraine attacks from 10.44±4.38 to 3.18±4.48 i.e., 70.2% from baseline is seen with topiramate.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that both propranolol and topiramate could significantly reduce migraine headache frequency, duration and intensity. However, compared with propranolol topiramate showed better results. topiramate 25 mg reduced the symptoms like frequency, duration and severity of migraine attacks from base line at the end of six months but more number of adverse effects were seen in topiramate group.

Author Biographies

Keelu Rajkumar, Department of Pharmacology, Shanthiram Medical College, Nandyal, Kurnool district, Andhra Pradesh, India

department of pharmacology,assistant professor

Pothuru Anil Kumar, Department of Pharmacology, Viswabharathi Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India

Pharmacology,Assistant professor..

References

Dahlof C, Linde M. One-year prevalence of migraine in Sweden: a population-based study in adults. Cephalalgia 2001;21:664-71.

Headache classification subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(1):9-160.

Eriksen M, Thomsen L, Andersen I, Nazim F, Olesen J. “Clinical characteristics of 363 patients with familial migraine with aura”. Cephalalgia 2004;24:564-75.

Meyer J, Thornby J, Ceawford K, Rauch G. Reversible cognitive decline accompanies migraine and cluster headache. Headache. 2000;40:638-46.

Ashtari F, Shaygannejad V, Akbari M. A double‐blind, randomized trial of low‐dose topiramate vs propranolol in migraine prophylaxis. Acta Neurologica Scandinav. 2008;118(5):301-5.

Tonekaboni SH, Ghazavi A, Fayyazi A, Khajeh A, Taghdiri MM, Gorji FA, Azarghashb E. Prophylaxis of childhood migraine: topiramate versus propranolol. Iran J Child Neurol. 2013;7(1):9.

Shuaib A, Ahmed F, Muratoglu M, Kochanski P. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis: a pilot study [abstract]. Cephalalgia 1999;19:379-80.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-22

How to Cite

Rajkumar, K., & Kumar, P. A. (2021). A prospective randomized single blind study to compare the safety and efficacy of propronolol and topiramate in migraine prophylaxis. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 10(4), 425–428. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20211027

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles