Published: 2019-06-24

Knowledge, attitude and practices about adverse drug reaction among medical students in a medical college: an observational study

Roshi ., Vishal R. Tandon, Brij M. Gupta


Background: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are usually associated with drugs which may or may not go unnoticed. ADRs are of great concern for any health care set up as they directly or indirectly add to the cost of treatment, prolongation of treatment, hospital stay or sometimes may even cause death. Spontaneous ADR reporting forms an important part of pharmacovigilance.

Methods: An observational study was carried out in a medical college to know the knowledge, attitude and practice being followed by them in a Medical College.

Results: In present study all the students had knowledge about ADRs. Only 86.7% of the students knew how and where to report an ADR. 73.3% of the students knew who can report an ADR and they had visited ADRM centre but only 60% of the students knew which ADR is to be reported. 88% of the students had an attitude that it is important to report an ADR and 86.7% told that it is useful to report an ADR. 99.3% of the students had never reported an ADR. Only 1.4% of the students had really visited ADRM centre of their institution but none of the students had ever visited wards or OPDs to look for ADRs. 26.7% of the students said that they will report an ADR if they see it ever.

Conclusions: There is good knowledge about ADRs and ADRM centre among students, but it needs to bring ADR reporting into practice by actively doing hands on workshops or by adding this exercise into practical curriculum.


Adverse drug reaction, Awareness practice, Pharmacovigilance

Full Text:



Beard K. Adverse reactions as a cause of hospital admission in the aged. Drugs Aging. 1992;2(4):356-67.

McDonnell PJ, Jacobs MR. Hospital admissions resulting from preventable adverse drug reactions. Ann Pharmacother. 2002; 36(9):1331-6.

Ramesh M, Pandit J, Parthasarathi G. Adverse drug reactions in a south Indian hospital-their severity and cost involved. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12(8):687-92.

Bahekar SE, Patil SM. Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reactions reporting among doctors and nursing staff of a rural tertiary care teaching hospital of Maharashtra. J Med Sci Res 2018;1(3):145-50.

WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines. Pharmacovigilance: ensuring the safe use of medicines. No. 009, 2004. Available at: Accessed 23 April 2018.

Ganesan S, Sandhiya S, Reddy KC, Subrahmanyam DK, Adithan C. The impact of the educational intervention on knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacovigilance toward adverse drug reactions reporting among health‑care professionals in a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2017;8(2):203-09.

Rawlins MD. Spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions. I: the data. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 19881;26(1):1-5.

Gupta P, Udupa A. Adverse drug reporting and pharmacovigilance: knowledge, attitude and perception among resident doctors. J Pharm Sci Res. 2011;3(2):1064-6.

Desai CK, Iyer G, Panchal J, Shah S, Dikshit RK. An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among prescribers at a tertiary care hospital. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(4):129-36.

Palaian S, Ibrahim MI, Mishra P. Health professionals’ knowledge, attitude and practices towards pharmacovigilance in Nepal. Pharm Pract. (Granada). 2011;9(4):228-35.

Beedimani RS, Zaman SU, Darbha S, Potturi SC. An evaluation of knowledge, attitude and practice of pharmacovigilance among medical students and doctors at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2018;7:324-32.

Chopra D, Wardhan N, Rehan HS. Knowledge, attitude and practices associated with adverse drug reaction reporting amongst doctors in a teaching hospital. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2011;23(4):227-32.