Evaluation of pharmacovigilance concepts among healthcare professionals in Davangere, Karnataka, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20192658Keywords:
Awareness, Knowledge, Practice, PharmacovigilanceAbstract
Background: Adverse drug reactions are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Timely detection and reporting of adverse drug events through pharmacovigilance is the best tool we have to prevent adverse drug reaction. One of the major reasons for underutilization of pharmacovigilance in India is deficit in awareness, attitude and practice of pharmacovigilance. The objective of this study was to assess these parameters among healthcare professionals in our hospital.
Methods: 200 health care professionals (post graduate students, undergraduate students, interns and nurses) took part in the study. A pre-designed questionnaire structured to obtain information on pharmacovigilance was used for evaluation. Questionnaire also enquired on factors that deter respondents from reporting.
Results: Among undergraduates, the satisfactory responses for knowledge, awareness and practice of pharmacovigilance were 12%, 72% and 42% respectively and for postgraduates it was 52%, 48% and 26% respectively. For interns it was 4%, 38% and 8 % respectively and nurses 8%, 18% and 26% respectively. Only 1% of undergraduates and 14% of postgraduates showed satisfactory responses to all three categories evaluated. Undergraduate students had a significantly higher awareness scores among the categories (p<0.05). When it comes to knowledge and practice there was not much differences between groups. Lack of time to report was the most cited factor across all categories discouraging reporting.
Conclusions: Results are encouraging among undergraduate students, but not significantly better than postgraduates. The poor performance among interns and nurses is due to lack of awareness. A strong basic foundation course regarding pharmacovigilance in academics will help in effective implementation of pharmacovigilance.
Metrics
References
The World Health Organization. Safety of medicines: A guide to detecting and reporting adverse drug reactions. Geneva, 2002. Available at: http://www.aaas.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/jh2992e. Accessed 4 March 2019.
Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Wally TJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18820 patients. Br Med J. 2004;329:15-9.
Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200-05.
Srinivasan R, Ramya G. Adverse drug reaction causality assessment. Int J Res in Phar Che. 2011;1(3):606-11.
Mishra H, Kumar V. Pharmacovigilance: current scenario in a tertiary care teaching medical college in North India. J Pharmaco. 2013;1(2):1-4.
Prakash S. Pharmacovigilance in India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2007;39(3)123.
SK Gupta. Post marketing Surveillance. In: Text book of Pharmacovigilance. 1st ed. New Delhi, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers(P) Ltd; 2011:75.
Hardeep JK, Rakesh K. A survey on the knowledge, attitude and the practice of pharmacovigilance among the health care professionals in a teaching hospital in northern India. J Clin Diagno Res. 2013;7(1):97-9.
Gupta SK, Nayak RP, Shivaranjani R, Vidyarthi SK. A questionnaire study on the knowledge, attitude, and the practice of pharmacovigilance among the healthcare professionals in a teaching hospital in South India. Pers in Clin Res. 2015;6(1):45-52.
Sunitha k, Anurag S, Pslaniappan S. Evaluation of knowledge, awareness, and attitude practice among nurses in pharmacovigilance at teritary care hospital in Delhi. J Harmo Res Pharm. 2015;4(1):76-86.
Madhusudhan SK, Shashikala GH. Evaluation of knowledge, awareness, and practice of pharmacovigilance among practicing doctors. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016;9(3):283-6.