DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20161517

Carvedilol as nephroprotective agent: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Sharanabasayyaswamy B. Hiremath, Srinivas D. Lokikere

Abstract


Background: Carvedilol is supposed to have nephroprotective effects owing to its additional antioxidant activity. We aimed to analyse the nephroprotective efficacy of carvedilol versus other active treatments and placebo using its effect on urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR).

Methods: Electronic database search in PUBMED, EMBASE, cochrane library was conducted using search terms “carvedilol” and “proteinuria”. Randomized or cross-over studies comparing effects of carvedilol versus other active treatment or placebo were included under analysis. Inverse variance method and both random and fixed effect models were used in the analysis. RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Total four studies (n) were eligible with 1036 (N) patients included in the analysis. Carvedilol failed to show significant effect on UACR when compared with all active treatments (standardised mean difference, SMD = -0.80 mg/g, 95% CI = -2.37, 0.76, n=5, N=1036) and placebo (mean difference, MD = -0.88 mg/g, 95% CI=-5.26, 3.51, n=2, N=75). It was superior to beta-1 blockers (SMD = -0.26 mg/g, 95% CI=-0.39, -0.13, n=2, N=963) and inferior to ACEIs/ARBs (MD = 7.45, 95% CI=0.29, 14.61, n=2, N=73).

Conclusions: There are low quality evidences to suggesting nephroprotective efficacy of carvedilol to be superior to beta-1 blockers in patients especially with diabetes as co-morbidity. Considering the drawbacks of our study, results need to be cautiously interpreted.


Keywords


Carvedilol, Nephroprotective, Antioxidant, UACR

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lerma EV, Desai P, Java P. Proteinuria, 2015. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/238158-overview#a3. Accessed 28 January 2015.

Snyder S, John JS. Workup for proteinuria. Prim Care. 2014;41(4):719-35.

Sandsmark DK, Messé SR, Zhang X, Roy J, Nessel L, Hamm L, et al. Proteinuria, but Not eGFR, Predicts Stroke Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease: Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2075-80.

Kalaitzidis RG, Bakris GL. Should proteinuria reduction be the criterion for antihypertensive drug selection for patients with kidney disease? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2009;18(5):386-91.

Thamcharoen N, Susantitaphong P, Wongrakpanich S, Chongsathidkiet P, Tantrachoti P, Pitukweerakul S, et al. Effect of N- and T-type calcium channel blocker on proteinuria, blood pressure and kidney function in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis. Hypertension Research. 2015;38:847-55.

Li X, Yang MS. Effects of T-type calcium channel blockers on renal function and aldosterone in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e109834.

Steigerwalt S. Management of hypertension in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Spectrum. 2008;21(1):31-6.

Saul SM, Duprez DA, Zhong W, Grandits GA, Cohn JN. Effect of carvedilol, lisinopril and their combination on vascular and cardiac health in patients with borderline blood pressure: The DETECT Study. Journal of Human Hypertension. 2013:27:362-7.

Jawa A, Nachimuthu S, Pendergrass M, Asnani S, Fonseca V. Beta-blockers have a beneficial effect upon endothelial function and microalbuminuria in African-American subjects with diabetes and hypertension. J Diabetes Complications. 2008;22(5):303-8.

Tylicki L, Biedunkiewicz B, Chamienia A, Wojnarowski K, Zdrojewski Z, Rutkowski B. Randomized placebo-controlled study on the effects of losartan and carvedilol on albuminuria in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2006;81(1):52-6.

Bakris GL, Fonseca V, Katholi RE, McGill JB, Messerli F, Phillips RA, et al. Differential effects of β-blockers on albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hypertension. 2005:46:1309-15.

Fassbinder W, Quarder O, Waltz A. Treatment with carvedilol is associated with a significant reduction in microalbuminuria: a multicentre randomised study. Int J Clin Pract. 1999;53(7):519-22.

Marchi F, Ciriello G. Efficacy of carvedilol in mild to moderate essential hypertension and effects on microalbuminuria: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study versus atenolol. Adv Ther. 1995;12(4):212-21.

Nancy GB, Robert AP. Meta-analysis: neither quick nor easy. BMC medical research methodology. 2002;2:10.

Sharma P, Blackburn RC, Parke CL, McCullough K, Marks A, Black C. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for adults with early (stage 1 to 3) non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011;10:CD007751.

Kumagai H, Hyodo T, Kushiyama T, Higashi K, Yamamoto K. Antihypertensive treatment for chronic kidney disease. Nihon Rinsho. 2008;66(8):1574-81.

Hawkins RG, Houston MC. Is population-wide diuretic use directly associated with the incidence of end-stage renal disease in the United States? A hypothesis. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18(6):744-9.

Ravera M, Re M, Deferrari L, Vettoretti S, Deferrari G. Importance of blood pressure control in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:98-103.

Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ. Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ. 2009;338:b1665.

Bakris GL, Hart P, Ritz E. Beta blockers in the management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2006;70(11):1905-13.

Dupont AG. Effects of carvedilol on renal function. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38(2):96-100.

Segall L, Nistor I, Covic A. Heart failure in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic integrative review. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:937398.

Bangalore S, Wild D, Parker S, kukin M, Messerli FH. Beta-blockers for primary prevention of heart failure in patients with hypertension. insights from a meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;52:1062-72.

Butler J. Primary prevention of heart failure. SRN Cardiol. 2012;2012:982417.