A randomized controlled study on expectant management of incomplete abortions caused by self medication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20192211Keywords:
Expectant management, Self medication, Surgical curettageAbstract
Background: Medical method of termination of pregnancy is a very effective method when used as per recommended regimen and under proper supervision. Self-administration of these drugs has become a very common practice these days, resulting in incomplete abortion because of improper use. Traditionally surgical curettage has been the preferred mode of treatment for these cases but is associated with very high complication rates. Expectant management of incomplete abortion has been recently adopted as a better method of management of incomplete abortions worldwide. Present study compares expectant management with surgical curettage in cases of incomplete abortions caused by self medication.
Methods: It was one-year prospective randomized controlled study. Total of 220 patients were recruited for the study out of which 103 were randomized to undergo expectant management while 117 to undergo surgical curettage. Results were compared using chi square test..
Results: Success rate of expectant and surgical management was found to be 82% and 95% respectively. Complication rate was found to be comparable in both the group while acceptability of expectant management was found to be much higher in expectant group. However, significantly more unplanned admissions and unplanned surgical curettage occurred after expectant management than surgical management.
Conclusions: Expectant management is a safe and efficacious option in carefully selected cases. If used properly it can avoid complications associated with surgical management and therefore should be utilized whenever suitable.
References
Government of India. The medical termination of pregnancy rules (amendment). 2003. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Department of Family Welfare: Notification, New Delhi, the 13th June 2003. Available at: http://mohfw.nic.in.
World Health Organization. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidelines for health systems (online). 2012;1-7. Available at: www.apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/709141/9789241548434 eng.pdf.
Ankum WM. Management of first trimester miscarriage. Br J Hosp Med. 2008;69:380-3.
Creinin MD, Harwood B, Guido RS, Fox MC, Zhang J. Endometrial thickness after misoprostol use for early pregnancy failure. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;86:22-6.
Davis AR, Hendlish SK, Westhoff C, Frederick MM, Zhang J, Gilles JM, Barnhart K, Creinin MD. Bleeding patterns after misoprostol vs surgical treatment of early pregnancy failure: results from a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:31.e31-7.
Debby A, Golan A, Sadan O, Rotmensch S, Malinger G. Sonographic characteristics of the uterine cavity following first-trimester uterine evacuation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:555-9.
Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL, Heymans MW, Opmeer BC, Brölmann HA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;20(2):262-78.
Kong GW, Lok IH, Yiu AK, Hui AS, Lai BP, Chung TK. Clinical and psychological impact after surgical, medical or expectant management of first-trimester miscarriage-a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53:170-7.
Trinder J, Brocklehurst P, Porter R, Read M, Vyas S, Smith L. Management of miscarriage: expectant, medical, or surgical? Results of randomised controlled trial (miscarriage treatment (MIST) trial). Br Med J. 2006;332:1235-40.
You JH, Chung TK. Expectant, medical or surgical treatment for spontaneous abortion in first trimester of pregnancy: a cost analysis. Hum Rep. 2005;20:2873-8.
Nanda K, Peloggia A, Grimes D, Lopez L, Nanda G. Expectant care versus [4] surgical treatment for miscarriage. Coch Database Sys Rev. 2006;(2):CD003518.
Casikar I, Bignardi T, Riemke J, Alhamdan D, Condous G. Expectant management of spontaneous first‐trimester miscarriage: prospective validation of the ‘2‐week rule’. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2010;35(2):223-7.
Jurkovic D, Overton C, Bender-Atik R. Diagnosis and management of first trimester miscarriage. BMJ. 2013;346:f3676.
Wieringa-de Waard M, Hartman EE, Ankum WM, Reitsma JB, Bindels PJE, Bonsel GJ. Expectant management versus surgical evacuation in first trimester miscarriage: health-related quality of life in randomized and non-randomized patients. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1638-42.
Lemmers M, Verschoor MA, Oude Rengerink K, Naaktgeboren C, Opmeer BC, Bossuyt PM, et al.MisoREST: surgical versus expectant management in women with an incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2421-7.
Bagratee JS, Khullar V, Regan L, Moodley J, Kagoro H. A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(2):266-71.
Jurkovic D. Modern management of miscarriage: is there a place for non‐surgical treatment?. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 1998;11(3):161-3.
Hurd WW, Whitfield RR, Randolph Jr JF, Kercher ML. Expectant management versus elective curettage for the treatment of spontaneous abortion. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(4):601-6.
Nielsen S, Hahlin M, Möller A, Granberg S. Pregnancy: Bereavement, grieving and psychological morbidity after first trimester spontaneous abortion: comparing expectant management with surgical evacuation. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(8):1767-70.
Sajan R, Pulikkathodi M, Vahab A, Kunjitty VM, Imrana HS. Expectant versus surgical management of early pregnancy miscarriages-A prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(10):QC06.
