Comparison between the different new anti-coagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: network meta-analysis

Authors

  • Hala Mohammed Albutti Department of Pharmacy, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20190162

Keywords:

Anti-coagulant, Atrial fibrillation, Drugs, Non-valvular heart disease

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is associated with high risk of ischaemic stroke which is considered a major fatal complication in atrial fibrillation. That’s why, anticoagulants were used to prevent this major complication. However, anticoagulants themselves are associated with their own complications. A systematic search of Embase, Medline and Google scholar were conducted. The included papers were extracted for outcomes related to the complications of each drugs. A Bayesian network meta-analysis based on Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation (MCMC) with 10000 burn-in iterations and 50000 inference iterations. We found eighteen papers that fit our inclusion criteria. Apixaban had the least risk of major bleeding compared to Warfarin [HR = 0.536, 95% (0.448, 0.652)] and the least risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. For stroke risk, the Rivaroxaban had the least risk compared to Warfarin [HR = 1.05, 95% (0.98, 1.14)]. For intracranial hemorrhage, dabigatran had the least risk of intracranial haemorrhage compared to Warfarin [HR = 0.46, 95% CrI (0.36, 0.61)]. For the thromboembolism risk, other non-vitamin k antagonist had the least risk of intracranial haemorrhage compared to Warfarin [HR = 0.523, 95% (0.095, 2.85)]. There were no conclusive results about the best anticoagulant drugs for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Apixaban was the least among them to be associated with major bleeding, while rivaroxaban was ranked the first with least stroke complications. Furthermore, dabigatran was associated with less risk of intracranial haemorrhage compared to other anticoagulants.

References

Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mahé I, Extramiana F. Management of atrial fibrillation. Bmj. 2009 Dec 23;339:b5216.

Maan A, Padmanabhan R, Shaikh AY, Mansour M, Ruskin JN, Heist EK. Newer anticoagulants in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review of the literature. Cardiol Review. 2012 Sep 1;20(5):209-21.

Wanat MA. Novel oral anticoagulants: a review of new agents. Postgraduate Med. 2013 Jul 1;125(4):103-14.

Heeringa J, van der Kuip DAM, Hofman A, et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Euro Heart J. 2006;27(8):949-53.

Mekaj YH, Mekaj AY, Duci SB, Miftari EI. New oral anticoagulants: their advantages and disadvantages compared with vitamin K antagonists in the prevention and treatment of patients with thromboembolic events. Therapeutics Clinical Risk Manag. 2015;11:967.

Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H, Gansser D, Roth W. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. British J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64(3):292-303.

Halvorsen S, Ghanima W, Fride Tvete I, Hoxmark C, Falck P, Solli O, Jonasson C. A nationwide registry study to compare bleeding rates in patients with atrial fibrillation being prescribed oral anticoagulants. Euro Heart J Cardiovas Pharma. 2016 Sep 27;3(1):28-36.

Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M, Zhang R, Southworth MR, Levenson M, et al. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. 2014:157-64.

Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Nielsen PB, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GY. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2016;353:i3189.

Abraham NS, Singh S, Alexander GC, Heien H, Haas LR, Crown W, et al. Comparative risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2015 Apr 24;350:h1857.

Villines TC, Schnee J, Fraeman K, Siu K, Reynolds MW, Collins J, et al. A comparison of the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in a large healthcare system. Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2015 Dec;114(06):1290-8.

Noseworthy PA, Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR, McBane RD, Shah ND. Direct comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for effectiveness and safety in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2016;150(6):1302-12.

Seeger JD, Bykov K, Bartels DB, Huybrechts K, Zint K, Schneeweiss S. Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in routine care of patients with atrial fibrillation. Thrombosis haemostasis. 2015;55:1277-89.

Staerk L, Fosbøl EL, Lip GY, Lamberts M, Bonde AN, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke associated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin use in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. Euro Heart J. 2016 Oct 14;38(12):907-15.

Lip GY, Keshishian A, Kamble S, Pan X, Mardekian J, Horblyuk R, Hamilton M. Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2016 May;115(05):975-86.

Lip GYH, Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Rasmussen LH. Indirect comparisons of new oral anticoagulant drugs for efficacy and safety when used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J American Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(8):738-46.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Study Quality Assessment Tools, 2018. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.

Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Statistics Med. 2010;29(7-8):932-44.

Avgil-Tsadok M, Jackevicius C, Essebag V, Eisenberg MJ, Rahme E, Behlouli H, et al. Dabigatran use in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2016;115(01):152-60.

Bouillon K, Bertrand M, Maura G, Blotière P-o, Ricordeau P, Zureik M. Risk of bleeding and arterial thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fi brillation either maintained on a vitamin K antagonist or switched to a non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulant: a retrospective, matched-cohort study. The Lancet Haematology. 2015;2(4):e150-9.

Chan YH, Kuo CT, Yeh YH, Chang SH, Wu LS, Lee HF, Tu HT, See LC. Thromboembolic, bleeding, and mortality risks of rivaroxaban and dabigatran in Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 27;68(13):1389-401.

Coleman CI, Antz M, Bowrin K, Evers T, Simard EP, Bonnemeier H, et al. Real-world evidence of stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States: the REVISIT-US study. Curr Med Res Opinion. 2016 Dec 1;32(12):2047-53.

Gorst-Rasmussen A, Lip GY, Bjerregaard Larsen T. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin and dabigatran in atrial fibrillation: comparative effectiveness and safety in Danish routine care. Pharmacoepidemiology Drug Safety. 2016;25(11):1236-1244.

Hernandez I, Baik SH, Pinera A, Zhang Y. Risk of bleeding with dabigatran in atrial fibrillation. JAMA internal medicine. 2015;175(1):18-24.

Laliberté F, Cloutier M, Nelson WW, Coleman CI, Pilon D, Olson WH, et al. Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Curr Med Res Opinion. 2014 Jul 1;30(7):1317-25.

Lauffenburger JC, Farley JF, Gehi AK, Rhoney DH, Brookhart MA, Fang G. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran and warfarin in real-world US patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Heart Association. 2015;4(4).

Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR, Bellolio MF, McBane RD, Shah ND, et al. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Association. 2016 Jun 1;5(6):e003725.

Rubboli A, Becattini C, Verheugt FW. Incidence, clinical impact and risk of bleeding during oral anticoagulation therapy. World J Cardiol. 2011;3(11):351-8.

Sterne JA, Bodalia PN, Bryden PA, Davies PA, López-López JA, Okoli GN, et al. Oral anticoagulants for primary prevention, treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic disease, and for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assessment Volume. 2017;21(9).

Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. New England J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51.

Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. New Eng J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):883-91.

Mantha S, Ansell J. An indirect comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for atrial fibrillation. Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2012;108(09):476-84.

Rasmussen LH, Larsen TB, Graungaard T, Skjøth F, Lip GY. Primary and secondary prevention with new oral anticoagulant drugs for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: indirect comparison analysis. BMJ. 2012 Nov 5;345:e7097.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-24

How to Cite

Albutti, H. M. (2019). Comparison between the different new anti-coagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: network meta-analysis. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 8(2), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20190162

Issue

Section

Review Articles