DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20160696

Reassessment of dispensing pharmacy and animal experiments in undergraduate practical pharmacology curriculum: feedback from students

Satish GR, Laxminarayana Kamath, Jayanthi C. R.

Abstract


Background: Dispensing pharmacy exercises and animal experiments are still being taught in medical colleges even though they are not relevant for clinical practice. One has to keep pace with ever changing needs of the students and changing trends. So this study is designed to know the perceptions and alternative suggestions of MBBS students regarding dispensing pharmacy and animal experiments and use them to improve teaching.

Methods: 177 MBBS students studying at Bangalore medical college who have completed their university examination in pharmacology subject were included in this questionnaire based study. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Majority of the students disfavoured dispensing pharmacy (82%) and animal experiments (73%) in undergraduate practical pharmacology. 78% of the students preferred computer assisted learning (CAL) as an alternative to animal experiments. Some of the clinical pharmacology exercises favoured by students,  as an alternative to dispensing pharmacy were, drug station (clinical station) with real cases in hospital (88%), module on various drug formulations (74%), module on pharmacovigilance (74%), problem based exercises (73%), drug administration procedures (68%), drug dosage calculations (68%), pharmacoeconomic exercises (66%), prescription writing and criticism of prescription (62%), short term research project (44%) and so on.

Conclusions: Computer assisted learning seems to be a better alternative to animal experiments. In the changing scenario, teaching clinical pharmacology should be focused rather than teaching dispensing pharmacy, which is obsolete.


Keywords


Students, Dispensing pharmacy, Animal experiments, CAL, Clinical pharmacology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Tikoo D, Gupta M, Geeta S. Student feedback on teaching-learning methodology and evaluation methods in pharmacology. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015;4:1260-6.

Hughes I. 20/20 vision-teaching pharmacology in 2020 new knowledge, skills, tools and attitudes. Available at: www.socesfar.com/attachments/article/106/2009.pdf

Accessed on 20 January, 2016.

Maxwell S, Walley T. Teaching safe and effective prescribing in UK medical schools: a core curriculum for tomorrow’s doctors. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55(6):496-503.

Saurabh MK, Agrawal J. The opinion of undergraduate medical students on current curriculum and teaching methodology of pharmacology in four medical colleges of India: a questionnaire based study. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015;4:970-5.

Raveendran R, Batmanabane G. Alternatives to animals in teaching: experience in an Indian medical school. In proceedings of the ALTEX 8th World Congress, Montreal 2011 (Vol. 206). Available at: www.altex.ch/resources/355360Raveendran31.pdf. Accessed on 20 January, 2016.

Medical council of India, New Delhi, amendment notification of 8 July 2009 to the minimal standard requirements for medical colleges with 150 admissions annually, regulations, 1999. Available at: http://www.mciindia.org/helpdesk/how_to_start/STANDARD%20FOR%20150.pdf. Accessed on 20 January, 2016.

Committee for the purpose of control and supervision of experiments on animals (CPCSEA). Available at: http://moef.nic.in/modules/divisions/cpcsea/. Accessed on 20 January, 2016.

Badyal DK, Desai C. Animal use in pharmacology education and research: The changing scenario. Indian J Pharmacol. 2014;46(3):257-65.

Vasundara K, Pundarikaksha HP, Vijendra R, Girish K, Jyothi R, Srinivasa P. Existing and expected practical medical pharmacology curriculum - A survey. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2011;5(2):340-3.

Seropian M, Dillman D, Lasater K, Gavilanes J. Mannequin-based simulation to reinforce pharmacology concepts. Simul Healthc. 2007;2(4):218-23.

Tembhurne SV, Sakarkar DM. Alternative to use of live animal in teaching pharmacology and physiology in pharmacy undergraduate curriculum: an assessment of 120 students’ views. Int J Med Pharm Sci. 2011;1(1):4-7.

Babu CS, Latha K, Thirunavukkarasu J, Tharani CB. Pharmacology virtual experimental pharmacology an alternative or not?-a global assessment by pharmacology faculties and MBBS students. Rec Res Sci Tech. 2011;3(10):25-9.

Nettath S. Computer assisted learning (CAL) as a teaching learning method in teaching experimental pharmacology. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2014;3:63-5.

Tikoo D, Gupta M. Student’s perception and experience of computer assisted learning as a teaching method in experimental pharmacology. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015;4:1168-74.

Dhingra MS, Singh A, Singh J. Animal experiments and pharmacology teaching at medical schools in India: a student’s eye view. AATEX. 2006;11(3):185-91.

Vision 2015, Medical Council of India Available from: http://www.mciindia.org/tools/announcement/MCI_booklet.pdf. Accessed on 16 January, 2016.

Blewett EL, Kisamore JL. Evaluation of an interactive, case-based review session in teaching medical microbiology. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:56.

Hughes I. Teaching pharmacology in 2010 - new knowledge, new tools, new attitudes. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2003;122(5):411-8.

Tabassum R, Bhat MY, Farhat S. A descriptive study of knowledge of Pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions among second professional undergraduate medical students in a teaching hospital. Intern J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015;4(5):1016-20.

Han WH, Maxwell SR. Are medical students adequately trained to prescribe at the point of graduation? Views of first year foundation doctors. Scott Med J. 2006;51(4):27-32.

Nitya S, Mangaiarkkarasi A, Ali RM, Sawadkar MS. Intern’s knowledge of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics at Puducherry: a cross-sectional study. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2013;2:622-8.