Undergraduate medical students’ perception regarding computer assisted learning in experimental pharmacology practical

Manish Kumar; Manish Kumar; Hitesh Mishra; Pramod Kumar Manjhi; Akash Chandra; Lalit Mohan; Harihar Dikshit

doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20180671

Authors

Manish Kumar Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India
Manish Kumar Department of Physiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India
Hitesh Mishra Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India
Pramod Kumar Manjhi Department of Pharmacology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Akash Chandra Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India
Lalit Mohan Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India
Harihar Dikshit Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20180671

Keywords:

Animal simulator, Computer assisted learning, Experimental pharmacology practical

Abstract

Background: Main objective of this study was to find out the students’ perception and to obtain feedback towards the use of Animal Simulator to demonstrate drug effects in terms of its acceptability, advantages and disadvantages of Computer Assisted Learning (CAL) in experimental pharmacology practical as an educational tool.

Methods: Questionnaire based study, done on randomly and voluntarily selected ninety-six fourth and fifth semester MBBS Students. Divided into four groups and each group contained 24 students. Students were taught experimental pharmacology practical online using Animal simulator (CAL- Computer Assisted Learning) for 2 hours on different days in three sessions. Questions and their feedback was taken during these sessions and presented in tables. Statistical analysis of data was done using Graph Pad software.

Results: Majority of students i.e. 64 (66.67%) agreed that in vitro and in vivo experiments on animals are essential for better understanding and learning of the biological process. Students were agreed to the majority of the statements for CAL like enjoyable and time saving, easy to perform, contributes more to understanding theoretical concepts, no experimental error seen, welcome change and best alternative to laboratory practical and many experiments can be demonstrated in a short time. Students were disagreed on statements like CAL is an effective method of teaching practical aspects and preferred experimentation than laboratory practical. Majority of students given yes/positive response to questions showing advantages of using CAL. Also, positive feedback was obtained regarding questions showing disadvantages of using CAL software.

Conclusions: Students’ perception regarding practical with CAL laboratory using animal simulator was good. The overall view was expressed that they found the exercises interesting and educationally beneficial. Computer assisted learning is a feasible and very effective teaching and learning method in pharmacology with huge potential to change the way of learning as it meets the majority of the learning objectives.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sudha J. Graduate training programmes in pharmacology in India. Health administrator. 2006;19(1):88-91.

Kuruvilla A, Ramalingam S, Bose AC, Shastri GV, Bhuvaneswari K, Amudha G. Use of Computer Assisted Learning as an Adjuvant to Practical Pharmacology Teaching: Advantages and Limitations. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2001;33:272-5.

Baby LT, Kavalakkat JC, Abraham S, Sathianarayanan S. CAL: A modern tool for pharmacology. (Computer Assisted Learning). The Internet Journal of Medical Simulation. 2009;2:62-4.

Kuruvilla A, Ernest K. Patient oriented problem solving system of teaching pharmacology, Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 1994;26(3):185-7.

PeTA INDIA. PETA Gets Set to Celebrate End of Animal Dissection in Indian Universities [homepage on the Internet]. c2011 [updated 2011 March 25]. Available at: https://www.petaindia.com/media/peta-gets-set-celebrate-end-animal-dissection-indian-universities/

Animal Experiments: Overview, PETA, accessed June 30, 2010. Also see Rosenberg, Howard. Fighting tooth and claw, The Los Angeles Times, March 22, 1992.

The Gazette of India. Extraordinary. part III- Section 4. [No. 88]. New Delhi, Wednesday, March 19, 2014/Phalguna 28, 1935. Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999-Animal House. Medical Council of India Notification. New Delhi, the 18th March, 2014 [No.MCI-34(41)/2013-Med./64020]. [document on the internet]. Available at: https://www.mciindia.org/documents/e_Gazette_Amendments/estt-new-med-col-regulation-1999.pdf

Ahirwar M, Sinha A, Shakya A, Kumar V. Computer Assisted Learning in Pharmacology: An Update. Alternatives to Animal Experiment Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi-221 005, UP, India.

Glick SM. Animals for teaching purpose: medical students’ attitude. Med Edu. 1995;29:39-42.

Medhi B, Sukhija M, Upadhayay S, Bhatia A, Anuradha K. Experimental teaching and interactive computer assisted learning: The student’s viewpoint. JK Science, October-December 2005;7(4).

Dahanukar SA. Practical programme for MBBS students. Indian J Pharmacol. 1999;31:380-2.

Bhavsar VH, Vajpeyee SK, Joshi NJ, Mistry SD, Kantharia ND, Sharma AK, et al. Training during practical pharmacology sessions for undergraduate medical students: An experience with a modified teaching programme. Indian J Pharmacol 1999;31:176-86.

Bapna JS. Experience in teaching rational drug use. Indian J Pharmacol. 1993;25:2-4.

Hardin L, Patrick TB. Content review of medical educational software assessments. Medical Teacher. 1998;20:207-11.

Sethuraman KR. Computer assisted learning In: Srinivasa DK, Ananthakrishnan N, Sethuraman KR, Kumar S, editors. Medical education- principles and practice. National Teacher Training Centre, JIPMER, Pondicherry; 1995:77-81.

Horn LD, Radhakrishnan J, Saini S, Pepper GM, Peterson SJ. Evaluation of a computer program for teaching laboratory diagnosis of acid-base disorders. Computers in Biomedical Research. 1992;25:562-86.