Pharmaco-prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for in-patients at risk, in a tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Sheetal John Department of Pharmacology, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Atiya R. Faruqui Department of Pharmacology, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Soumya Umesh Department of Medicine, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20175672

Keywords:

Deep vein thrombosis, Padua score, Prophylaxis, Venous thromboembolism

Abstract

Background: There is limited data from India on Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Prophylaxis. This study was done in hospitalised patients at high risk for DVT, to determine the patterns and rates of pharmacoprophylaxis, drugs used and their clinical outcomes.

Methods: This prospective study screened patients for risk of DVT using the Padua risk assessment model. Padua score ≥4 were included and data on disease demographics, prophylaxis and outcomes of DVT at 12 weeks were collected. Factors affecting prophylaxis were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Out of 453 screened, 200 eligible patients were recruited. 48.5% were females; mean age was 54.6±16.6; 50.5% received some thromboprophylaxis, of which 24%, 35.5% and 9% received pharmacoprophylaxis, mechanoprophylaxis and a combination of both respectively. Low Molecular Weight Heparin was the most commonly used drug (77.1%). Adverse drug reactions reported were 24, none related to anticoagulant use. At 12 weeks, 18 (9%) patients gave history suggestive of DVT. 5 deaths were reported, but the cause could not be ascertained. Patients who had cardiac/ respiratory failure [OR =5.2 (95%CI - 1.13, 24.6), p = 0.03], acute MI or stroke [OR = 9.0 (3.5, 23.09), p <0.001], those admitted to medical specialties [OR = 3.4 -1.4, 7.9), p = 0.004] and to private wards [OR = 7.4 (3.13, 17.5), p <0.001] had significantly higher chances of receiving prophylaxis.

Conclusions: Underutilisation of effective prophylaxis, despite high prevalence of DVT risk. Emphasis on routine risk assessment of hospitalized patients and administration of appropriate prophylaxis to those at high risk is required.

References

Spyropoulos AC, Lin J. Direct medical costs of venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospital readmission rates: an administrative claims analysis from 30 managed care organizations. J Manag Care Pharm JMCP. 2007;13(6):475-86.

Roshni S. General introduction and outline of the thesis. 2012. Available at: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/18334/01.pdf.

Hirsh J, Hoak J. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology). Am Heart Ass. Circu. 1996;93(12):2212-45.

Kanchanabat B, Stapanavatr W, Meknavin S, Soorapanth C, Sumanasrethakul C, Kanchanasuttirak P. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the rate of postoperative venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery in Asian patients without thromboprophylaxis. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1356-64.

Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):809-15.

Huang W, Anderson FA, Spencer FA, Gallus A, Goldberg RJ. Risk-assessment models for predicting venous thromboembolism among hospitalized non-surgical patients: a systematic review. J Thromb. 2013;35(1):67-80.

Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, Ferrari A, Brandolin B, Perlati M, et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thrombol Haemost JTH. 2010;8(11):2450-7.

Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Prins MH, Büller HR. Deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet Lond Engl. 1999;353(9151):479-85.

Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Prins MH. Management studies using a combination of D-dimer test result and clinical probability to rule out venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost JTH. 2005;3(11):2465-70.

Wells PS, Owen C, Doucette S, Fergusson D, Tran H. Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis? JAMA. 2006;295(2):199-207.

Arina CH. New developments in diagnosis and Treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Datawyse Maastricht; Available at: http://digitalarchive.maastrichtuniversity.nl/fedora/get/guid:87d5ea74-3702.../ASSET1. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.

Grosse SD, Nelson RE, Nyarko KA, Richardson LC, Raskob GE. The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs. Thromb Res. 2016;137:3-10.

Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann J-F, Goldhaber SZ, Kakkar AK, Deslandes B, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2008;371(9610):387-94.

Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, Ferrari A, Brandolin B, Perlati M, et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost JTH. 2010;8(11):2450-7.

Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann J-F, Goldhaber SZ, Kakkar AK, Deslandes B, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2008;371(9610):387-94.

Pinjala R. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE), a multinational cross-sectional study: Results from the Indian subset data. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136(1):60-7.

Rossetto V, Barbar S, Vedovetto V, Milan M, Prandoni P. Physicians’ compliance with the Padua Prediction Score for preventing venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medical patients. J Thromb Haemost JTH. 2013;11(7):1428-30.

Roderick P, Ferris G, Wilson K, Halls H, Jackson D, Collins R, et al. Towards evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic reviews of mechanical methods, oral anticoagulation, dextran and regional anaesthesia as thromboprophylaxis. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2005;9(49):1-78.

Otero R, Uresandi F, Cayuela A, Blanquer J, Cabezudo MA, De Gregorio MA, et al. Use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for surgical patients: a multicentre analysis of practice in Spain. Eur J Surg Acta Chir. 2001;167(3):163-7.

Yu HT, Dylan ML, Lin J, Dubois RW. Hospitals’ compliance with prophylaxis guidelines for venous thromboembolism. Am J Health-Syst Pharm AJHP Off J Am Soc Health-Syst Pharm. 2007;64(1):69-76.

Amin A, Stemkowski S, Lin J, Yang G. Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure? J Thromb Haemost JTH. 2007;5(8):1610-6.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-23

How to Cite

John, S., Faruqui, A. R., & Umesh, S. (2017). Pharmaco-prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis for in-patients at risk, in a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 7(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20175672

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles