Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, 13736 Moshtohor


  • Warida M. El-Rwegi Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology & Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli, 13662 Tripoli
  • Amer A. Elgerwi Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology & Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli, 13662 Tripoli
  • Abubakr M. El-Mahmoudy Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, 13736 Moshtohor



Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Piroxicam, Meloxicam, Anti-inflammatory, Intestinal contractility, Autonomic pharmacology


Background: To shed some light on full characterization and utilization of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in veterinary medicine, this study, therefore, was designed to clarify the pharmacological effects of two NSAIDs (one selective, that is meloxicam, and the other is non-selective, that is piroxicam) on intestinal contractility of rabbit as a farm animal species.

Methods: Rabbits were humanely slaughtered, and segments from different parts of intestinal tracts were dissected out and an intestinal segment of about 2 cm long was fixed in an organ bath containing warm oxygenated Tyrode’s solution at 37°C. The tissue was subjected to a resting tension of 2 g and allowed to equilibrate for 30 min and then the effects of graded increased concentrations of piroxicam and meloxicam were demonstrated on the normal rhythmic motility of the isolated intestinal segments. The sites of action of piroxicam and meloxicam were tried.

Results: Piroxicam and meloxicam exhibited concentration-dependent relaxations of intestinal smooth muscle segments with minimal and maximal effects of more potency by prioxicam than meloxicam. Calculated inhibitory concentration 50% were 15.45 and 23.10 μg/ml bath for piroxicam and meloxicam, respectively. Effects of either piroxicam or meloxicam did not involve cholinergic, adrenergic, histaminergic, nitrergic, or purinergic pathways as the application of the corresponding agonists/antagonists did not affect the inhibitory response of piroxicam and meloxicam. It was assumed that the effects of the drugs were attributed to the direct effects of the drugs on the intestines in addition to inhibiting endogenous prostaglandin synthesis activity via their cyclo-oxygenase inhibiting properties.

Conclusions: Data of the present study may indicate that piroxicam and meloxicam could be used effectively and safely in rabbits for their anti-inflammatory actions in small therapeutic doses. However, in large doses, they (particularly, piroxicam) may produce depressant effects on gastrointestinal tract motility that should be taken in consideration in the case of introducing these drugs in therapy with larger doses.


Ong CK, Lirk P, Tan CH, Seymour RA. An evidence-based update on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Med Res. 2007;5(1):19-34.

Copeland RA, Williams JM, Giannaras J, Nurnberg S, Covington M, Pinto D, et al. Mechanism of selective inhibition of the inducible isoform of prostaglandin G/H synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(23):11202-6.

Dhikav V, Singh S, Pande S, Chawla A, Anand KS. Non-steroidal drug-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: mechanisms and management. J Indian Acad Clin Med. 2003;4(4):315-22.

NIH. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Committee on Care Use of Laboratory Animals. Division of Research Resources. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources: National Academies; 1985.

University of Edinburgh Department of Pharmacology. Pharmacological Experiments on Isolated Preparation. 2nd Edition. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone, E and S Ltd.; 1970.

Valeri P, Martinelli B, Morrone LA, Severini C. Reproducible withdrawal contractions of isolated guinea-pig ileum after brief morphine exposure: effects of clonidine and nifedipine. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1990;42(2):115-20.

Burke A, Smyth E, Fitzgerald GA. Analgesic-antipyretic and anti-inflammatory agents; pharmacotherapy of gout. In: Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL, editors. Goodman & Gilman’s the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th Edition. NY, USA: McGraw Hill Companies; 2006: 671-715.

Hildebrand P, Tschannen B, Villiger P, Egger M, Jüni P. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for oral use in dogs only, and in the what is metacam section in bold-face type: do not use in cats, 2005. Available at Accessed 14 May 2015.

Lichtenberger LM, Bhattarai D, Phan TM, Dial EJ, Uray K. Suppression of contractile activity in the small intestine by indomethacin and omeprazole. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;308(9):G785-93.

Shahbazian A, Schuligoi R, Heinemann A, Peskar BA, Holzer P. Disturbance of peristalsis in the guinea-pig isolated small intestine by indomethacin, but not cyclo-oxygenase isoform-selective inhibitors. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132(6):1299-309.

Herbert MK, Weis R, Holzer P, Roewer N. Peristalsis in the Guinea pig small intestine in vitro is impaired by acetaminophen but not aspirin and dipyrone. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(1):120-7.

Menozzi A, Pozzoli C, Poli E, Dacasto M, Giantin M, Lopparelli RM, et al. Effects of nonselective and selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors on small intestinal motility in the horse. Res Vet Sci. 2009;86(1):129-35




How to Cite

El-Rwegi, W. M., Elgerwi, A. A., & El-Mahmoudy, A. M. (2016). Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, 13736 Moshtohor. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 4(5), 924–930.



Original Research Articles