DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20172718

A prospective study on the use of anesthetic agents in modern surgical practice at a tertiary care hospital, Karnataka, India

Deeptangshu Ganguly, Dharani D. Ranganath, Manohar Herle, Rajasekhar C. H., Kokila B. Nagaraj

Abstract


Background: The choice of local anesthetic is based on potency of the agent, onset and duration of anesthesia, and side effects of the drug Objectives of the study were, the study proposes to analysis the pattern, trend, rationality and frequency of use of anesthetic agents in modern surgical procedures.

Methods: The study records relevant data obtained from surgical case records of patients from department of General surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Orthopedics during the period December 2014 to May 2015 including first one month of pilot study, at KVGMC, Sullia (D.K), Karnataka.

Results: A total of 744 cases were collected and screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and finally 348 cases were recorded and critically analysed. Sub-arachnoid block is the most common type of anesthetic procedure (75.28%) performed by the anesthetists. Of 348 cases undergoing anesthesia using local anesthetic agents, 228 cases required only a single agent and 120 cases required a combination anesthetic agents. 206 underwent sub-arachnoid block, 16 epidural block (EPID) and only 2 brachial block. The most commonly used agent for maintainence of general anesthesia is Isoflurane (68%) followed by Halothane (32%) and the combination of skeletal muscle relaxants were Succinylcholine with either Atracurium (39.8%) or Vecuronium (37.16%). Analgesics were the most commonly used adjuvants followed by ondansetron.

Conclusions: The study showed that the most common anesthetic procedure performed using local anesthetic agents is SA/SAB block and the most common agent used is bupivacaine which was frequently employed at the dose range of 3-4 ml. There was significant association found between the no. of anesthetic agents used and the type of anesthetic procedure performed and also between the concerned department and the type of anesthetic procedure performed. Thus, the rationality in the usage of relevant anesthetic agents with appropriate adjuvants is evident.


Keywords


General anesthetics, Local anesthetics, Rational drug use

Full Text:

PDF

References


Katzung BG, Masters SB, Trevor AJ. General anesthetics. In: Basic and clinical pharmacology.11th Ed. NewYork: McGraw Hill; 2009:423.

Brunton LL, Chabner BA, Knollman BC. General anesthetics and therapeutic gases. In: Goodman & Gillman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12th Ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2011:527-582.

Covino BG, Giddon DB. Pharmacology of local anesthetic agents. J Dent Res. 1981 Aug;60(8):1454-9.

Scott DB, Jebson PJ, Braid DP, Ortengren B, Frisch P. Factors affecting plasma levels of lignocaine and prilocaine. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1972 Oct 1;44(10):1040-9.

Becker DE, Reed KL. Essentials of Local Anesthetic Pharmacology. Anesth Prog. 2006;53(3):98-109.

Barash, Paul G, Cullen, Bruce F, Stoelting, Robert K. Clinical Anesthesia. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

Corning JL. Spinal anesthesia and local medications of the cord. NewYork Med J. 1885;42:483.

Concepcion MA. Spinal anesthetic agents. International anesthesiology clinics. 1989 Apr 1;27(1):21-5.

MIMS Online. Bupivacaine Hydrochloride (Internet). [cited 2007 September 26]. Available at: http://mims.hcn.net.au.ezproxy.library.uwa.edu.au

MIMS Online. Ropivacaine Hydrochloride (Internet). [cited 2007 September 26]. Available at: http://mims.hcn.net.au.ezproxy.library.uwa.edu.au

Rull G. Action against Medical Accidents (Internet). [updated on 2010 May 21; cited on 2013 Oct 31]. Available at: http://www.patient.co.uk/doctor/important-complications-of-anaesthesia

Hyderally H. Complications of spinal anesthesia. Mt Sinai J Med. 2002 Jan-Mar;69(1-2):55-6.

Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. Jun 1992;76(6):906-16.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:843-63.

Braga Ade F, Frias JA, Braga FS, Pereira RI, Titotto SM. Spinal anesthesia for elective ceasarean section: use of different doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine associated with morphine and clonidine. Acta Cir Bras. 2013 Jan;28(1):26-32.

Tarkkila PJ, Kaukinen S. Complications during spinal anesthesia: a prospective study. Reg Anesth. 1991 Mar-Apr;16(2):101-6.

Lamacraft G. Complications associated with regional anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 2004 Oct;10(1):15-20.