DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20172733

Adherence to ARRIVE guidelines in animal research articles published in a National and International Pharmacology Journal

Jitendra H. Hotwani, Kiran R. Deshmukh, Manthan N. Mehta

Abstract


Background: This study compares the adherence to Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines in an Indian (IJP: Indian Journal of Pharmacology) and International journal (JPET: Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics).

Methods: All original animal studies published in IJP and JPET between January 2014 and September 2015 were downloaded manually and 100 articles were randomly chosen from each journal and analyzed using the ARRIVE guidelines checklist and checked for adherence.

Results: Most articles indicated the ethical statement (IJP- 96%, JPET- 98%). Steps taken to minimize effects of subjective bias in the study design were not mentioned in more than half the articles (IJP-50%, JPET-37%). Details of experimental animals were not adequately reported (IJP- 79%, JPET-68%). Details of animal housing (IJP-20%, JPET-39%) and husbandry (IJP-59%, JPET-51%) were poorly reported. Explanation of sample size calculation was mentioned in 2% and 1% articles in IJP and JPET. Statistical methods were well explained, yet the methods used to assess whether the data met the assumptions of the statistical approach was poorly reported.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrates relatively suboptimal reporting standards in animal studies published in IJP and JPET. Adherence to ARRIVE guidelines can be improved.


Keywords


Animal experiments, ARRIVE, Experimental pharmacology, Publication guidelines, Reporting research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hartung T. Look back in anger- What clinical studies tell us about preclinical work. ALTEX. 2013;30(3):275‑91.

Dikshit RK. Animal experiments: Confusion, contradiction, and controversy. Indian J Pharmacol. 2012;44(6):661‑62.

Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, Bracken MB, Roberts I and Reviewing Animal Trials Systematically (RATS) Group. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ. 2004 Feb 28;328(7438):514‑7.

Van der Worp HB, Howells DW, Sena ES, Porritt MJ, Rewell S, O'Collins V, et al. Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS med. 2010 Mar 30;7(3):e1000245.

Baker D, Lidster K, Sottomayor A, Amor S. Two years later: Journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre‑clinical animal studies. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(1):e1001756.

Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, Festing MFW, Cuthill IC, Fry D, et al. Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7824.

Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412.

Indian Journal of Pharmacology. Available at: http://www.ijp‑online.com. Accessed 10 April 2017.

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. Available at: http://www.jpet.aspetjournals.org. Accessed 10 April 2017.

The ARRIVE Guidelines Checklist - NC3Rs. Available at: https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Guidelines/NC3Rs%20ARRIVE%20Guidelines%20Checklist% 20(fillable).pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017.

McCance I. Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal. Aust Vet J. 1995;72(9):322-8.