Monitoring cutaneous adverse drug reactions in patients on TDF+3TC+EFV: a single centre experience

Authors

  • Nikhil Era Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata 700073, West Bengal, India
  • Shatavisa Mukherjee Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata 700073, West Bengal, India
  • Bibhuti Saha Department of Tropical Medicine, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata 700073, West Bengal, India
  • Santanu Kumar Tripathi Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata 700073, West Bengal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20172243

Keywords:

Antiretroviral therapy, Cutaneous adverse drug reactions, Nail pigmentations, Skin hyperpigmentations, Steven-Johnson syndrome

Abstract

Background: HIV-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy may manifest a wide variety of ADRs ranging from trivial manifestation, such as rashes, pigmentation, to severe life‑threatening reactions, such as Steven–Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis. The present study thus monitored cutaneous adverse drug reactions in patients on first line antiretroviral regimen comprising of tenofovir disoproxil fumerate, lamivudine and efavirenz as a three drug-combination.

Methods: A prospective observational clinical study was carried out for a period of one year among PLHIV receiving TDF+3TC+EFV as first line regimen in the outpatient setting of a nodal ART centre of eastern India.

Results: The major regimen induced dermatological complications presenting in our study set up included rashes, itching, SJS, pigmentation of nails, skin Hyperpigmentation. The morbilliform eruption, often referred to as a maculopapular rash, is the most common type of reaction occurring after treatment initiation.

Conclusions: Adverse drug reactions are one of the most common public health concerns, which influence patients' treatment options along with health care costs.

References

Mudzviti T, Sibanda M, Gavi S, Maponga CC, Morse GD. Implementing a pharmacovigilance program to evaluate cutaneous adverse drug reactions in an antiretroviral access program. Journal of infection in developing countries. 2012;6(11):806-8.

Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Aug; 30(2):239-45.

Hartwig SC, Siegel J, Schneider PJ. Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Sep; 49(9):2229-32.

HIV/AIDS. World Health Organization. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/hiv/en/. Accessed on April 01, 2017

Adverse effects of ARV. Available from: https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/html/1/adult-and-adolescent-arv-guidelines/31/adverse-effects-of-arv Accessed on April 01, 2017

Shear NH, Milpied, Bruynzeel DP, Phillips EJ. A review of drug patch testing and implications for HIV clinician. AIDS. 2008;22:999-1007.

Borras-Blasco J, Navarro-Ruiz A. Adverse cutaneous reactions as associated with the newest antiretroviral drugs in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2008;62:879-888.

Hartmann M, Enk A. Cutaneous Effects of Antiretroviral Therapy. Dtsch Arztebl. 2007;104(16):A 1098-1103.

Carr A, Vella S, de Jong MD, Sorice F, Imrie A, Boucher CA, et al. controlled trial of nevirapine plus zidovudine versus zidovudine alone in p24 antigenaemic HIV-infected patients. The Dutch- Italian - Australian Nevirapine Study Group. AIDS. 1996;10:635-41.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-23

How to Cite

Era, N., Mukherjee, S., Saha, B., & Tripathi, S. K. (2017). Monitoring cutaneous adverse drug reactions in patients on TDF+3TC+EFV: a single centre experience. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 6(6), 1467–1471. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20172243

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles