Community pharmacists’ perception of and practice with drug package inserts in UAE

Authors

  • Suleiman I. Sharif Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P. O. Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • Jalal Edien M.W. Alkharrat Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P. O. Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • Lubna A. Khaled Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P. O. Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • Nour Elhouda Arafeh Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P. O. Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • Sana Y. Birawi Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P. O. Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20170315

Keywords:

Community pharmacists, Drug package inserts, Knowledge, Perception, Practice

Abstract

Background: Written information in drug package inserts (DPIs) is important source of information for doctors and pharmacists. Objectives: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the knowledge, perception and practice of community pharmacists with information in the DPIs, and their views on their usefulness.

Methods: Seventy five pre-piloted questionnaires were distributed to community pharmacists in the United Arab Emirates. The questionnaire included questions covering demographics of pharmacists and whether they read and rely on DPI as a source of information. Pharmacists were also asked to evaluate and categorize DPI information with respect to the ease for patient use. The data were analyzed and are expressed as frequency and percentage.

Results: The response rate was 90.7%. The majority (52, 76.5%) of pharmacists were in the age range of 20-39 years, with bachelor of pharmacy degree (50, 73.5%) and having 1-10 years of practice experience (48, 70.6%). Two thirds of the respondents obtained their degree outside the UAE. The majority (60, 88.2%) of pharmacists read the DPIs of prescription and OTC drugs, for all the information and think it is useful (67, 98.5%). Most participants think DPI is useful to patients and advise them to read it. The majority (49, 72.1%) of pharmacists believe that DPI are clear to read but their content should be shorter (46, 67.6%) and limited to the most important information (51, 75%). More pharmacists with a degree from outside UAE do not read the DPIs (p < 0.003), and find DPIs easily understood (P <0.008). More pharmacists with 1-5 years’ experience advise their patients to read the DPIs (P<0.033).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there is a need for improving the content of drug package inserts to provide the necessary information required not only for health care professionals but also patients to further enhance their acceptance of and compliance with their medications.

References

Regner MJ, Hermann F, Ried LD. Effectiveness of a printed leaflet for enabling patients to use digoxin side-effect information. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987;21(2):200-4.

Mottram DR, Reed C. Comparative evaluation of patient information leaflets by pharmacists, doctors and the general public. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1997;22(2):127-34.

Fuchs J, Hippius M, Schaefer M. Analysis of German package inserts. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;44(1):8-13.

Gibbs, S, Waters, WE, George, CF. The benefits of Prescription Information Leaflets (1). Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;27:723-39.

Gibbs S, Waters WE, George CF. Prescription Information leaflets, a national survey. J R Soc Med. 1990;83:292-7.

Weitbrecht WU, Vosskämper C. Influence of the drug package information paper on compliance of neurological and psychiatric outpatients. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie. 2002;70(4):178-84.

Vander Stichele RH, Van Dierendonck A, De Vooght G, Reynvoet B, Lammertyn J. Impact of benefit messages in patient package inserts on subjective drug perception. Drug Inform J. 2002;26:201-8.

Little P, Griffin S, Kelly J, Dickson N, Sadler C. Effect of educational leaflets and questions on knowledge of contraception in women taking the combined contraceptive pill: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 1998;316:1948-52.

Myers ED, Calvert EJ. Information, compliance and side-effects: a study of patients on antidepressant medication. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;17(1):21-5.

Cohen, JS. Dose discrepancies between physicians’ desk reference and the medical literature and their possible role in the high incidence of dose- related adverse drug events. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:957-64.

Hassali MA, Khan TM, Shafie AA. Use of drug information resources by the community pharmacist in Penang, Malaysia. Inform Prim Care. 2010;18(3):213-6.

Cheraghali AM, Idries AM. Availability, affordability, and prescribing pattern of medicines in Sudan. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(2):209-15.

Diobi K, Fakeye TO, Adisa R. Community Pharmacists’ Perception of the Relevance of Drug Package Insert as Source of Drug Information in Southwestern Nigeria. Tropi. J. Pharmaceut Res. 2013;12(3):439-43.

Zehnder S, Beutler M, Bruppacher R, Ehrenhöfer T, Hersberger KE. Needs and use of drug information sources in community pharmacies: a questionnaire based survey in German-speaking Switzerland. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26(4):197-202.

Shrank WH, Avorn J. Educating patients about their medications: the potential and limitations of written drug information. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(3):731-40.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-28

How to Cite

Sharif, S. I., Alkharrat, J. E. M., Khaled, L. A., Arafeh, N. E., & Birawi, S. Y. (2017). Community pharmacists’ perception of and practice with drug package inserts in UAE. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 6(2), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20170315

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles