DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20164127

A comparison of computer assisted learning and practical animal experiment for undergraduate medical students in pharmacology curriculum - a questionnaire based study conducted in a medical college of North India

Diwanshu Sharma, Pavan Malhotra

Abstract


Background: The practical sessions in pharmacology training involving animal experiments were perceived to be unnecessary as the learning objectives of these practical sessions primarily focus on observational, analytical and interpretative skills. A number of computer simulation and other models have been recommended for use as alternatives to use of animals for medical education. In this study, we compared Computer Assisted Learning (CAL) with practical animal experiments for medical undergraduates based on questionnaire. The objective of the study was to compare Computer Assisted Learning and practical animal experiments for medical undergraduates in pharmacology curriculum.

Methods: This was a questionnaire based observational study involving 300 medical undergraduates and eighteen faculty members. It included two systems i.e. CAL and conventional animal experiments. A separate questionnaire was prepared for the faculty members.

Results: Results showed that CAL has nearly replaced the practical laboratory experiments as far as the medical undergraduate training is concerned. All the students and teachers believed that CAL is better and more understandable than animal experiments done practically.

Conclusions: It is concluded that CAL is a better source of experimentation at the undergraduate level and provides dependable outcomes.


Keywords


Computer assisted learning, Medical undergraduates, Practical animal experiments

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dewhurst D. Is it possible to meet the learning objectives of undergraduate pharmacology classes with non-animal models? AATEX. 2008;14:207-12.

Hughes IE. Do computer simulations of laboratory practicals meet learning needs? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22:71-4.

Moss S. Computer technology in education. Pharm J. 1993;251:491.

Baby LT, Kavalakkat JC, Abraham S, Sathianarayanan S. CAL: A modern tool for Pharmacology. Internet J of Medical Simulation. 2009;2:2.

Brain S, Dewhurst D, Williams A. Evaluation of a computer-based learning program to support student learning in pharmacology. ALT-J. 1999;7:37-45.

Dewhurst DG, Hardcastle J, Hardcastle PT, Stuart E. Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:S95-104.

Leathard HL, Dewhurst DG. Comparison of cost effectiveness of a computer assisted learning program with tutored demonstration to teach intestinal motility to medical students. ALT-J. 1995;3:118-25.

Wang L. Computer-simulated pharmacology experiments for undergraduate pharmacy students: Experience from an Australian university. Indian J Pharmacol. 2001;33:280-2.

Govindaraja C, Jaiprakash H, Annamalai C, Vedhavathy SS. Computer assisted learning: Perceptions and knowledge skills of undergraduate medical students in a Malaysian medical school. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;1:63-7.

Sewell RD, Stevens RG, Lewis DJ. Pharmacology experimental benefits from the use of computer assisted learning. Am J Pharm Educ. 1996;60:303-7.

Hughes IE. Computer-based learning-an aid to successful teaching of pharmacology? Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2002;366:77-82.