The opinion of undergraduate medical students on current curriculum and teaching methodology of pharmacology in four medical colleges of India: a questionnaire based study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20150876Keywords:
Undergraduate medical student, Curriculum, Teaching methodology, PharmacologyAbstract
Background: The objective of current study was to obtain an opinion from 2nd professional year passed medical students on current curriculum, teaching methodology and importance of pharmacology subject and to identify the area of improvement.
Methods: A set questionnaire was distributed among randomly distributed to 2nd year passed 100 undergraduate (UG) students to each of four medical colleges. They were instructed to tick out the best possible option of each question on the basis of their own perceptions. They are also asked to give suggestion to improve teaching and learning of pharmacology subject.
Results: Out of the 400 students, only 387 responses of students were suitable for data analysis. The majority of students 99.22% (384) were unsatisfied with the practical teaching. Teachings of preparing and dispensing types of exercises were irrelevant in today’s clinical practice according to 87.78% of the students and were in favor of the deletion of such exercises from the curriculum. The analysis showed that 62.27% of the students were the opinion that animals should not be used in experimental pharmacology. More than half of the UGs (63%) supported the use of computer assisted learning. All of the students were interested in the inclusion of case, problem and multiple choice based question discussions in the regular teaching classes followed by quizzes (31.78%) and group discussions (14.47) while small number of students (1.03%) were interested in the conduction of seminars.
Conclusion: There is an urgent need to reform the curriculum and practical teaching methods for fulfilling the objective of reading pharmacology.
References
Desai M. Changing face of pharmacology practicals for medical undergraduates. Indian J Pharmacol. 2009;41(4):151-2.
Gitanjali B. New wine in new bottles. Indian J Pharmacol. 2004;36:63-4.
Ruth N. Communicating student evaluation of teaching results: rating interpretation guides (RIGs). Assess Eval High Educ. 2000;25(2):121-34.
Victoroff KZ, Hogan S. Students’ perceptions of effective learning experiences in dental school: a qualitative study using a critical incident technique. J Dent Educ. 2006;70(2):124-32.
AIIMS students unhappy with archaic syllabus. Times of India. 2004 Feb, 20. Available at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Aiims Students Unhappy With Archaic Syllabus.
Medical Council of India regulation on graduate medical education 1997. New Delhi: Medical Council of India. Available at http://www.mciindia.org/Rules-and-Regulation/GME_REGULATIONS.pdf. Accessed 04 June 2015.
Medhi B, Sukhija M, Upadhayay S, Bhatia A, Anuradha K. Experimental teaching and interactive computer assisted learning: the students point view. JK Sci. 2005;7(4):220-2.
Wang L. Computer-stimulated pharmacology experiments for undergraduate pharmacy students: experience from an Australian university. Indian J Pharmacol. 2001;33:280-2.
Akat PB, Karande VB, Murthy MB, Burute SR. Interns opinion on ‘bedside pharmacology clinics’ and its incorporation in undergraduate curriculum. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012;3(1):56-8.
Kela AK, Mehta VL. Impact of inclusion of clinical projects in undergraduate teaching. Indian J Pharmacol. 1993;25(4):249-50.
Garg A, Rataboli PV, Muchandi K. Students’ opinion on the prevailing teaching methods in pharmacology and change recommended. Indian J Pharmacol. 2004;36(3):155-8.
Chadav N, Yadav P, Chaudhri M, Kantharia ND. Second year student’s feedback on teaching methodology and evaluation methods in pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;1(1):23-31.
Hariharan TS. Need for the changes in the practical pharmacology curriculum of medical graduates. Indian J Pharmacol. 2004;36(3):181.
Sharma R, Verma U, Kapoor B, Chopra VS. Novel teaching approaches in pharmacology. JK Sci. 2004;6(3):172-3.
Bhavsar VH. Experience regarding modification of the teaching and evaluation pattern in practical pharmacology. Indian J Pharmacol. 2004;36:385-9.
Mathur VS. Towards a more meaningful teaching a pharmacology. Indian J Pharmacol. 2004;36:258-61.
Kausal S, Chopra SC, Arora S. Modifications in the undergraduate MBBS pharmacology practical curriculum: the DMCH model. Indian J Pharmacol. 2007;39:57-9.
Sharma V, Sharma R. Pharmacolgy teaching: Need for a sea change. Indian J Pharmacol. 2009;41(6):288.
Joshi A, Trevedi M. Innovation in pharmacology teaching. Int J Pharm Biomed Res. 2010;1(2):62-4.
Naeem SS, Rizvi W, Kumar A. Revisiting undergraduate practical pharmacology. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012;3(1):76-9.
