DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20172226

Pattern of adverse drug reactions reporting in two medical colleges of Tripura, India: a cross sectional study

Anannya Chakraborty, Debasis Ray, Ranjib Ghosh, Nibedita Roy, Sayan Bhattacharje

Abstract


Background: India as an important clinical trial hub in the world. In clinical trials, many of the drug issues related to the safety are inadequately studied in highly selected and limited number of patients. Due to introduction of many new drugs in the country, it has become essential to have an effective Pharmacovigilance system nationwide. Under reporting of ADRs is widespread and a daunting challenge in Pharmacovigilance programme of India (PvPI).

Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted for two months with the objective to study the pattern of ADRs reporting in two teaching hospitals of Tripura. The data were collected in “Suspected ADR reporting forms” of Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC). Suspected ADRs were assessed for causality using Naranjo ADR probability scale.

Results: 44 ADR reporting forms were received with 58 ADRS. Among them, Gastrointestinal System ADRs were the highest (25.86%). More ADRs were seen in males than females (52.27% vs 47.72%). 68.18% cases had the medication through oral route. Out of all ADRs, 67.24% were Type A reactions. Most of the reactions reported, were mild (90.9%) based on modified Hartwig severity scale. Most of the ADRs reported were of probable causality (score 5-9) measured by Naranjo’s Algorithm.

Conclusions: This study would definitely give an insight into the pattern of ADRs in tertiary health care centers and may help to increase awareness of health care provider for further Pharmacovigilance studies.


Keywords


ADR reporting, Causality, Naranjo’s Algorithm, Pharmacovigilance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Edwards IR and Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356:1255-59.

Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, JP Brothers, 7th Ed, New Delhi; 2013:82-91.

Zhang M, Holman CDJ, Preen DB, Brameld K. Repeat adverse drug reactions causing hospitalization in older Australians: a population-based longitudinal study 1980-2003. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:163-70.

Kaur S, Kapoor V, Mahajan R, Lal M, Gupta S. Monitoring of incidence, severity, and causality of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients with cardiovascular disease. Indian J Pharmacol. 2011;43(1):22-6.

Tandon VR, Mahajan V, Khajuria V, Gillani Z, Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A challenge for pharmacovigilance in India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2015;47(1):65-71.

Rehan HS, Sah RK, Chopra D. Comparison of knowledge, attitude and practices of resident doctors and nurses on adverse drug reaction monitoring and reporting in a tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Pharmacol. 2012;44:699-703.

Patil JS. Pharmacovigilance in India. J Pharmacovigilance. 2014;2:2.

Dhikav V, Singh S, Anand KS. Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring in India. Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine. 2004;5(1):27-33.

Tandon VR, Mahajan V, Khajuria V, Gillani Z. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A challenge for pharmacovigilance in India. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2015;47:68-71.

Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:239-45.

Hartwig SC, Siegel J, Schneider PJ. Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992;49:2229-32.

Rawlins MD, Thompson JW. Pathogenesis of adverse drug reactions. In: Davies DM, editor. Textbook of adverse drug reactions. Vol 10. 1st Edition Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1977:27.

Gor AP, Desai SV. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) in the inpatients of Medicine Department of a Rural Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital and Influence of Pharmacovigilance in Reporting ADR. Indian J Pharmacol. 2008;40(1):37-40.

Saha A, Das NK, Hazra A, Gharami RC, Chowdhury SN, Datta PK. Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care outpatient setting in Eastern India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2012;44(6):792-7.

Belhekar MN, Taur SR, Munshi RP. A study of agreement between the Naranjo algorithm and WHO-UMC criteria for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions. Indian J Pharmacol. 2014;46(1):117-20.

Schwartz JB. The influence of sex on pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmaco. 2003;42:107-21.

Eileen G, Hollcend, Phevm D, Frank V. Degrig M.D. Drug induced disorder D. Family Physician. 1997;2:10.

Macedo AF, Marques FB, Ribeiro CF, Teixeira F. Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: comparison of the results obtained from published decisional algorithms and from the evaluations of an expert panel. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14:885-90.

Lei HS, Rahman AF, Haq AS. Adverse drug reaction reports in Malaysia: comparison of causality assessments. Malays J Pharm Sci. 2007;5:7-17.