Eye of horus – Erratum revealed a prescription survey

Authors

  • M. J. Jijin Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, K K Campus, Coorg, Karnataka, India
  • H. P. Jaishankar Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, JSS Dental College, Mysore, Karnataka, India
  • R. Krupashankar Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, K K Campus, Coorg, Karnataka, India
  • S. N. Veena Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, K K Campus, Coorg, Karnataka, India
  • A. P. Kavitha Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, K K Campus, Coorg, Karnataka, India
  • R. Shobha Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, K K Campus, Coorg, Karnataka, India

Keywords:

Prescriptions, Handwriting, Survey

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to survey the quality and the content of prescription of practitioners and also assess the legibility of alphabet, and short form of the drug.

Methods: A survey of all prescription received by the patients that were written by general practitioners, consulting physicians and dentists in and around Virajpet and Madikeri (south Coorg) was included.The prescriptions were photocopied and returned back to the patients. The prescription was scored and analyzed by a qualified medical investigator.

Results: A total of 171 prescription samples were collected. In most prescriptions, one or more aspects of patient’s personal details were missing. Concerned doctor’s details also lacked in most cases. 40.3% of the prescriptions were obtained wherein short form of the drug was used for prescribing drug. Legibility of alphabet was also evaluated and the most confusing letter noted in our study was letter “C”; followed by A, T, S, O, G, and D in this study the letter Rx was written in 7% of the prescription and in 19% prescription it was replaced by word “Adv” and 74% of prescription without symbol of Rx.

Conclusions: The present data shows most prescriptions in the study was inadequate and important details were lacking, legibility of prescription was poor in rating.

References

Okechukwu I, Bennett K, Feely J. General practitioners’ ranking of evidence-based prescribing quality indicators: a comparative study with a prescription database. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62(2):218-24.

Udaykumar P. Textbook of Pharmacology for Dental and Allied Health Sciences. 2nd Edition. India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publisher Ltd.; 2007: 408.

Jain S, Khan ZY, Upadhyaya P, Abhijeet K. Assessment of prescription pattern in private teaching hospital in India. Int J Pharm Sci. 2013;3(3):219-22.

Hartel MJ, Staub LP, Röder C, Eggli S. High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:199.

Rathnam A, Madan N. “Rx – The mistakes we make!!” a short study. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(5):684-7.

Patel V, Vaidya R, Naik D, Borker P. Irrational drug use in India: a prescription survey from Goa. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51(1):9-12.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-29

How to Cite

Jijin, M. J., Jaishankar, H. P., Krupashankar, R., Veena, S. N., Kavitha, A. P., & Shobha, R. (2017). Eye of horus – Erratum revealed a prescription survey. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 3(6), 1016–1019. Retrieved from https://www.ijbcp.com/index.php/ijbcp/article/view/1179

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles