DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20184313

Formative assessment of the communication skills related to drug delivery systems on standardized patients through group objective structured clinical encounters in second year medical students

Mohammed Imran, Syed M. Fatmi, Chintan Doshi, Darshan Kharadi

Abstract


Background: Choosing an appropriate Drug Delivery System (DDS) influences the acceptability, adherence and better outcome of the therapy in the patients. The present study was planned to evaluate the second year MBBS students on standardized patients (SP) using Group Objective Structured Clinical Encounters (GOSCE) after content delivery by traditional power point class versus experiential teaching methodology.

Methods: DDS practical class was held in two larger groups after adding two odd sub-groups (1+3) as ‘A’ (64 students) and even sub-groups (2+4) as ‘B’ (66 students). The formative GOSCE evaluation was done 2 weeks after the classes by the trained physician examiners as per the Medical Council of Canada pre-determined scoring instruments.

Results: The average magnitude of change in GOSCE scoring is extremely statistical significant on t-test (P< 0.0001) in favour of experiential teaching methodology for all the skills. The statistical significant percentage of students were able to extract the treatment history in respect of eliciting problem, reasons for non-compliance, methods of intake, explain the technique and showed the courteous professional behaviours.

Conclusions: The clinical cases as SP in pharmacology teaching for developing competency based communication skills and GOSCE are the appropriate methodology for evaluation of large student group for experiential DDS training.


Keywords


Drug delivery system, Early clinical exposure, MBBS students, Group objective structured clinical encounters, Pharmacological treatment history, Standardized patients

Full Text:

PDF

References


Liu M, Huang YS, Liu KM. Assessing core clinical competencies required of medical graduates in Taiwan. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2006;22(10):475-83.

Townsend AH, McLlvenny S, Miller CJ, Dunn EV. The use of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for formative and summative assessment in a general practice clinical attachment and its relationship to final medical school examination performance. Med Educ. 2001;35(9):841-6.

Mitchell ML, Henderson A, Groves M, Dalton M, Nulty D. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): optimising its value in the undergraduate nursing curriculum. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29(4):398-404.

Carter MB, Wesley G, Larson GM. Lecture versus standardized patient interaction in the surgical clerkship: a randomized prospective cross-over study. Am J Surg. 2006;191(2): 262-7.

Bennett AJ, Arnold LM, Welge JA. Use of standardized patients during a psychiatry clerkship. Acad Psychiatry. 2006;30(3):185-90.

Prochaska JJ, Gali K, Miller B, Hauer KE. Medical students’ attention to multiple risk behaviours: a standardized patient examination. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(6):700-7.

The Medical Council of India. Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997. Latest Amendment on July 2017. Available at: https://www.mciindia.org/documents/rulesAndRegulations/GME_REGULATIONS.pdf. [Accessed May 24, 2018].

Rickles NM, Tieu P, Myers L, Galal S, Chung V. The impact of a standardized patient program on student learning of communication skills. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(1):4.

James D, Nastasic S, Davies G, Horne R. The design and evaluation of a simulated-patient teaching programme to develop the consultation skills of undergraduate pharmacy students. Pharm World Sci. 2001;23(6):212-6.

Grice GR, Wenger P, Brooks N, Berry TM. Comparison of patient simulation methods used in a physical assessment course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(4):77.

The Medical Council of Canada. Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part II. 2014. Available at: http://www.mcc.ca/examinations/mccqe-part-ii). [Accessed May 22, 2018]

Sturpe DA. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations in Doctor of Pharmacy Programs in the United States. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(8):148.

Hughes F, Barry J, Belaid L. Development of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) to assess formulation and extemporaneous dispensing skills in Mpharm undergraduates. Pharm Educ. 2013;13(1):7-14.

Ludwig AB, Raff AC, Lin J, Schoenbaum E. Group observed structured clinical encounter (GOSCE) for third-year medical students improves self-assessment of clinical communication. Med Teach. 2017;39:931-5.

Konopasek L, Kelly KV, Bylund CL, Wenderoth S, Storey-Johnson C. The group objective structured clinical experience: building communication skills in the clinical reasoning context. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(1):79-85.

Elliot DL, Fields SA, Keenen TL, Jaffe AC, Toffler WL. Use of a group objective structured clinical examination with first year medical students. Acad Med. 1994;69(12):990-2.

Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301-12.

The Medical Council of India. Vision 2015. Available at: www.mciindia.org/tools/announcement/MCI_booklet.pdf. [Accessed May 25, 2018].

Hseih MC, Cheng WC, Chen TY. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) including critical simulation: Evaluation of medical student competence. Tzu Chi Medical J. 2014;26:40-3.

Haranath P. Medical curriculum and pharmacology: An appraisal. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016;48(Suppl 1):S10-S13.

Smithson J, Bellingan M, Glass B, Mills J. Standardized patients in pharmacy education. An integrative literature review. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2015;7(6):851-63.

Martineau B, Memede S, St-Onge C, Bergeron L. The influence of peer feedback on the acquisition of Physical-Examination Skills. Health Professions Education. 2016;2(2):106-13.