DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20182424

A study of clinical information of various package inserts: an approach to encourage adverse drug reaction reporting and emphasis on black box warning

Ervilla Dass

Abstract


Background: The package insert (PI) is important for providing accurate and reliable product information which is essential for the safe and effective use of medications.

Methods: A total number of 115 PIs from pharmacological drug class such as antibiotics, drugs acting on central nervous system and drugs acting on endocrine system were collected from pharmacy store. Contents and presentation of the PIs was critically evaluated by comparing the information as listed in the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.

Results: The results were expressed under headings as listed in the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. The information in the package inserts was inadequate in many aspects; for example, adverse drug reactions were not mentioned completely, information for special population and guidelines for use of the drugs also was lacking. Moreover, black box warning was seen only in few PI. For PI of antibiotics; legibility 80%, use in special populations 76.66%, undesirable effects 46.66%. For PI of CNS of legibility 60%, use in special populations 73.33%, undesirable effects 70%. For PI of endocrine system of legibility 70%, use in special populations 70%, undesirable effects 36.66%.

Conclusions: The results reveal that, information relevant to the safe and effective use of medication was not mentioned in the analyzed package inserts. It is, therefore, recommended to update the existing package inserts based on criteria mentioned in the Schedule D of Drug and Cosmetic Act, 1945.


Keywords


Package insert, Prescription drug labeling, Drugs and cosmetic rule

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ved JK. Package Inserts in India: Need for a Revision. Int J of Pha Sci and Rese. 2010;1(11):454-56.

World Health Organization and Health Action International, 2005. Drug promotion, what we know, what we have yet to learn. Reviews of materials in the WHO/HAIdatabase on drug promotion. Available at: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/s8109e/s8109e.pdf . Accessed 14 October, 2015.

Ramdas D, Chakraborty A, Swaroop HS, Syed F, Kumar PV, Srinivas BN. A Study of Package Inserts in Southern India. J of Cli and Diag Resea. 2013 Nov;7(11):2475-7.

Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Drug and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. Available at: http://cdsco.nic.in/html/DrugsandCosmeticAct.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov, 2011.

Prosser H, Almond S, Walley T. Influences on GPs′ decision to prescribe new drugs-the importance of who says what. Fam Pract. 2003;20:61-8.

Rajan MS, Sreedhar, Khan SA, Thiyagu R, Rao PG. Information seeking behaviour of clinicians in a semi urban town in southern India. J Clin Diag Res. 2008;2:1069-73.

Zaghi D, Maibach HI. Survey of safety and efficacy information in drug inserts for topical prescription medications. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2007;8(1):43-6.

An Introduction to the Improved FDA Prescription Drug Labeling. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/training/forhealthprofessionals/ucm090796.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov, 2011.

Lal A, Sethi A. Drug package inserts in India. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30:1041.

Essentials of medical pharmacology. Chapter 5: Aspects of pharmacotherapy; clinical pharmacology and drug development, page 71; 6th Edition, Jaypee Publication, New Delhi; 2008.

Bansal V, Dhamija P, Medhi B, Pandhi P. Package Inserts-do they have any role? JK- Practitioner. 2006;13(3):152-4.